Abstract
The American judical system continues to dampen the willingness of juvenile victims of sexual abuse to testify against their alleged abuser. A recent example of this continuing double victimization appears in the U.S. Supreme Court decision ofCoy v. Iowa (1988). The rights of minor sexual abuse victims are explored through case law, statutes, legal literature and historical references as they impact the minor during the judicial process. It is difficult to achieve justice for sexually abused children in a judicial system designed for adults; thus, the sexually abused child remains a double victim in our contemporary judicial system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, B.E., & Claman, L. (1986). Modern technology and the child witness.Child Welfare, LXV (2), 155–163.
Besharov, D.J. (1974).Juvenile justice advocacy: Practice in a unique court (2nd printing). New York: Practicing Law Institute.
Bienen, L. (1980). Rape III: National development in rape reform legislation.Women's Rights Law Reporter, 6 (3), 170–213.
Bremner, R.H. (Ed.). (1970)Children and youth in America: A documentary history, 1600–1865 (Vol. I). Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
Bulkley, J. (Ed.), (1981).Child sexual abuse: Legal issues and approaches. Washington, DC: National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection.
Bulkely, J. (Ed.). (1985).Evidentiary and procedural trends in state legislation and other emerging legal issues in child sexual abuse cases. Washington, DC: National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection.
Bulkely, J. (1988). Legal proceedings, reforms, and emerging issues in child sexual abuse cases.Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 6 (2), 153–180.
Coy v. Iowa, 487 US—, 101 L Ed 2d 857, 108 S Ct—, (1988)
Davidson, H.A., & Horowitz, R.M. (1984). Protection of children from maltreatment. In R.M. Horowitz and H.A. Davidson (Eds.).Legal rights of children (pp. 262–312). Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard's/McGraw-Hill.
DeFrancis, V. (1969).Protecting the child victim of sex crimes committed by adults. Denver, CO: The American Humane Association Children's Division.
Eatman, R. (1986). Videotaping interviews with child sex offense victims.Children's Legal Rights Journal, 7, (1), 13–19.
Expert testimony of child sexual abuse prosecutions: A spectrum of uses. (1988).Boston University Law Review, 68, 155–192.
Fed. R. Evid, 361–366.
42 USCA 5103 (b) 1984.
Glaser, D., & Frosh, S. (1988).Child sexual abuse. Chicago, IL: Dorsey.
Hewlett v. George, 68 Miss 703, 711, 9 So. 885, 887, (1891)
Johnson v. State, 21 Tenn, 291, 292 (1840)
Kempe, C.H., Silverman, F.N., Steele, B.F., Drogemueller, W., & Silver, H.K. (1962). The battered child syndrome.Journal of the American Medical Association, 181 17–24.
Larson, N.E., & Maddock, J.W. (1983). Incest and other sexual contacts between adults and children. In C.C. Nadelson and D.B. Marcotte (Eds.).Treatment intervention in human sexuality (pp. 157–179). New York: Plenum.
Libai, D. (1969). The protection of the child victim of a sexual offense in the criminal justice system.Wayne Law Review, 15, 977–1032.
Masters, R.E.L. (1963).Patterns of incest. New York: Julian.
Platt, A.M. (1977).The child savers: The invention of delinquency (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Recent Decision. (1987).Duquesne Law Review, 25, 519–536.
Schetky, D.H. (1988). The child as witness. in D.H. Schetcky and A.H. Green (Eds.),Child sexual abuse: A handbook for health care and legal professionals (pp. 166–180). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Schetky, D.H. (1988). Child sexual abuse in mythology, religion, and history. In D.H. Schetky and A.H. Green (Eds.),Child sexual abuse: A handbook for health care and legal professionals (pp. 19–29). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Summitt, R.C., (1963). The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome.Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 13–19.
Tannahill, R. (1980).Sex in history. New York: Stein & Day.
Thomas, M.P. (1972). Child abuse and neglect: Part I: Historical overview, legal matrix, and social perspectives.North Carolina Law Review, 50, 293–349.
Whitcomb, D. (1985). Assisting child victims in the courts: The practical side of legislative reform. In J. Bulkley (Eds.),Papers from a national policy conference on legal reforms in child sexual abuse cases (pp. 15–29). Washington, DC: National Legal Resource Center for Child Advocacy and Protection.
Whitcomb, D. (1986). Prosecuting child sexual abuse—new approaches.National Institute of Justice Reports. (Reports SNI 197). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Watkins, S.A. The double victim: The sexually abused child and the judicial system. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 7, 29–42 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00757587
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00757587