Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mediation of youth conflict: A multi-system perspective

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of mediation and conflict resolution skills for youth in a variety of settings has grown extensively during the past decade. Rather than remain in a largely passive role as adults attempt to solve their problems, youth mediation programs can empower young people to be actively involved in resolving conflicts they are faced with. This article examines the application of mediation techniques in a variety of systems, including: the family; the school; the neighborhood; and the juvenile justice system. A basic definition of mediation, along with its strengths and limitations is presented. Key characteristics of youth mediation programs from a number of different states are identified. Finally, several critical issues facing the field of youth development and mediation are identified and discussed. These issues include: imbalance of power and negotiating skills; coercive versus voluntary participation; and, net-widening/labelling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, James and Krisberg, Barry (1981). Wider, Stronger, and Different Nets: The Dialectics of Criminal Justice Reform.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, January.

  • Coates and Gehm (1990). An Empirical Assessment. In Martin Wright and Burt Galaway (eds.)Mediation and Criminal Justice. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittenhoffer, Tony and Ericson, Richard (1983). The Victim Offender Reconciliation Program: A Message to Correctional Reformers.University of Toronto Law Journal, Summer.

  • Doleschal, Eugene (1982). The Dangers of Criminal Justice Reform.Crime and Delinquency.

  • Merry, Sally (1985).The Children's Hearing Project Research Findings. Cambridge, MA: Children's Hearing Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Marlene (1983).Parent-Child Mediation: An Alternative That Works. New York, NY: The Children's Aid Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Dispute Resolution (1983).Paths to Justice: Major Public Policy Issues of Dispute Resolution. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phear, Patrick W. (1985). Parent-Child Mediation: Four States, Four Models.Mediation Quarterly, (7), 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Larry et al. (1985).Mediation in The Schools: A Report, Directory, and Bibliography. Washington, DC: American Bar Association, Special Committee on Dispute Resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Margaret L. (1985). Parent-Child Mediation: A Challenge and a Promise.Mediation Quarterly, (7), 23–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shonholtz, Raymond (1984). Neighborhood Justice Systems: Work, Structure, and Guiding Principles.Mediation Quarterly, September.

  • Silbey, Susan S. and Merry, Sally E. (1986). Mediation Settlement Strategies.Law and Policy, January.

  • Smith, Melinda (1990). New Mexico Youths Use Mediation To Settle Their Problems Peacefully.Corrections Today, June.

  • Sneider, Anne L. (1986). Restitution and Recidivism Rates of Juvenile Offenders: Results from Four Experimental Studies.Criminology,24 (3).

  • Umbreit, Mark S. (1989). Victims Seeking Fairness, Not Revenge: Toward Restorative Justice.Federal Probation, September.

  • Umbreit, Mark S. (1988). Mediation of Victim Offender Conflict.Journal of Dispute Resolution. University of Missouri School of Law, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, Mark S. (1986). Victim Offender Mediation and Judicial Leadership.Judicature, December.

  • Umbreit, Mark S. (1985).Crime and Reconciliation: Creative Options for Victims and Offenders. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorenberg, Elizabeth W. (1982).A State of the Art Survey of Dispute Resolution Programs Involving Juveniles. Washington, DC: American Bar Association, Special Committee on Alternative Means of Dispute Resolution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, Howard (1980).Mediating the Victim Offender Conflict. Elkhart, IN: Mennonite Central Committee Office on Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetzel, Geraldine W.K. and Wixted, Sandra (1984).Parent Child Mediation. Cambridge, MA: Children's Hearings Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zetzel, Geraldine W.K. (1985). In and Out of the Family Crucible: Reflections on Parent-Child Mediation.Mediation Quarterly, (7), 47–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Youth Development, University of Minnesota, 390 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford St., 55108, St. Paul, MN

    Mark S. Umbreit Ph.D. (Research Associate)

  2. School of Social Work, University of Minnesota, 390 McNeal Hall, 1985 Buford St., 55108, MN, St. Paul

    Mark S. Umbreit Ph.D. (Research Associate)

Authors
  1. Mark S. Umbreit Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Umbreit, M.S. Mediation of youth conflict: A multi-system perspective. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 8, 141–153 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00757555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00757555

Keywords

Search

Navigation