Child and Youth Care Forum

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 263–284 | Cite as

Advancing child and youth care: A model for integrating theory and practice through connecting education, training, and the service system

  • Karen VanderVen

Abstract

This article presents a comprehensive model for enabling connections to be made between theory and practice in the field of child and youth care, based on an analysis of current training and education in the field and a multi-step concept of theory-to-practice and practice-to-theory. The model presents a logical sequence of activities that generate and convey knowledge from two sources. One is formal empirical and research information; the other is the conceptualization of practitioners' direct experience. Both are reinforced by trainers and educators with dual connections with “practice” and “training and education” settings. The paper stresses that academic programs are a significant component of any profession, in that they are responsible for collecting and codifying emergent knowledge gathered from multiple sources.

References

  1. Barlow, D., Hayes, S., & Nelson, R. (1984).The scientist practitioner. Research and accountability in clinical and educational settings. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Beker, J., & Baizerman, M. (1982). Professionalization in child and youth care and the content of the work: Some new perspectives.Journal of Child Care, 1(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
  3. Beker, J., & Eisikovits, Z. (1991).Knowledge utilization in residential child and youth care practice. Washington, D.C.: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
  4. Beker, J., & Maier, H. (1981) Emerging issues in child and youth care education: A platform for planning.Child Care Quarterly, 10, 200–209.Google Scholar
  5. Brendtro, L., & Ness, A. (1983). Bridging theory and practice. In L. Brendtro & A. Ness,Re-educating troubled youth: Environments for teaching and treatment. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  6. Burgess, R. (1984):In the field. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Calfee, R. (1988, January). The school as a center of inquiry. Paper presented at the University of Pittsburgh School of Education.Google Scholar
  8. Central Council for Education and Training in Social Work. (1987). Care for tomorrow: Case for reform of education and training for social workers and other care staff. London: Author.Google Scholar
  9. Demers, M. (1987). Child and youth care education: perspectives in transformation. Victoria, B.C.: University of Victoria. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  10. Durkin, R. (1990) Restructuring for competence: A case for the democratization and communitization of chilren's programs. In J. Anglin, et al. (Eds.)Perspectives in Professional Child and Youth Care (pp. 105–117). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eisikovits, Z., Beker, J., & Guttmann, E. (1991). The known and the used in residential child and youth care work. In J. Beker & Z. Eisikovits (Eds.), (1991).Knowledge utilization in residential child and youth care practice (pp. 3–23). Washington, D.C.: Child Welfare League of America.Google Scholar
  12. Eisikovits, Z. & Beker, J. (1983). Beyond professionalism: The child and youth care worker as craftsman.Child Care Quarterly, 12(2), 93–112.Google Scholar
  13. Evans, D., & Hamilton, S. (1987). Accreditation of agencies and practice teaching in social work education: A discussion document. London: Central Council on Education and Training in Social Work.Google Scholar
  14. Garfat, T., & Newcomen, T. (1992). AS*IF: A model for thinking about child and youth care interventions.Child and Youth Care Forum, 21(4), 277–285.Google Scholar
  15. Garfat, T. (undated). Child care training and education in North America. Source unknown.Google Scholar
  16. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967)The discovery of grounded theory: Stategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  17. Grasso, A., Epstein, I., & Tripodi, T. (1988). Agency-based research utilization in a residential child care setting.Administration in Social Work, 12(4), 61–80.Google Scholar
  18. Group Child Care Consultant Services (1979). Advertisement.Child Care Quarterly, 8(4), 324.Google Scholar
  19. Hois, S. (1984). Learning styles and their implications for inservice training for early childhood staff. Master of Science thesis, Program in Child Development and Child Care, University of Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  20. Hunt, D. (1987).Beginning with ourselves: In practice, theory and human affairs. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, R. (1988). Proposal for Academy. Presented at International Child and Youth Care Conference Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  22. Krueger, M. (1983a).Careless to caring for troubled youth. Milwaukee: Tall Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Krueger, M. (1983b). The child care learning center: A practitioner designed training and staff development program for child/youth care workers.Child Care Quarterly, 12(2), 152–159.Google Scholar
  24. Maier, H. (1983). Should child and youth care go the craft or professional route?Child Care Quarterly, 12(2), 113–118.Google Scholar
  25. Manburg, A., & Powell, N. (1988). From recommendations to realities.The Child and Youth Care Administrator, 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
  26. Peterson, R., & Maciejewski, G. (1987, March). The aesthetics of training: Orchestrating self apprenticeship training, confluential teaching, and multi-level recursive learning in child and youth work education. Paper presented at Trainers and Educators Day, Albert E. Trieschman Memorial Conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  27. Powers, G., Meenaghan, T., & Toomey, B. (1985).Practice focused research: Integrating human service practice and research. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Schon, D. (1983).The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  29. Schon, D. (1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  30. Smith, C. (1988). Working with maladjusted children: There's nothing more practical than a good theory.Maladjustment and Therapeutic Education, 6(3), 146–147.Google Scholar
  31. VanderVen, K. (1990). International directory of training and education activities for child and youth care work. Washington, D.C.: National Organization of Child Care Workers Associations.Google Scholar
  32. VanderVen, K. (1985). Overview to training and education for child care practice. In K. VanderVen & E. Tittnich (Eds.)Competent caregivers—Competent children. New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  33. Walker, L. & Avant, K. (1988).Strategies for theory construction in nursing. Second Edition. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, M., & Davis, J. (1986, September). Practice learning centers. London: National Organisation for Practice Teaching.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen VanderVen
    • 1
  1. 1.Program in Child Development and Child Care, School of Social WorkUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations