Abstract
A possible physical justification of the Weyl gauge procedure is proposed. It is argued that in the case of a general affine connection geodesic parameters have a nontrivial functional relation to metric interval. Since geodesic parameters can also define a notion of interval (via Schild's ladder), we appear to have an inconsistency at the very foundation of any theory which incorporates a nonmetric-compatible connection. This inconsistency can be removed by postulating the Weyl transformations as a valid symmetry of nature, at least at the appropriate energy scale. The method would appear to work even in theories containing shear, provided that it too acquires a mass as a result of (or prior to) the breaking of Weyl symmetry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weyl, H. (1918).Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin, 465.
Hehl, F. W., McCrea, J. D., and Mielke, E. W. (1987/88). InExakte Wissenschaften und Ihre Philosophische Grundlegung. Vorträge des Internationalen Herrnann-Weyl-Kongresses, Kiel 1985, Deppert, W., Hübner, K., Obershelp, A., and Weidemann, V., eds. (Verlag Peter Lang, Frankfurt a.M.).
Minkowski, P. (1977).Phys. Lett.,71B, 419.
Nieh, H. T. (1982).Phys. Lett.,88A, 388.
Zee, A. (1979).Phys. Rev. Lett.,42, 417.
Bradfield, T. (1990)Gen. Rel. Grav.,21, 665.
Bradfield, T. (1990).Gen. Rel. Grav.,22, 217.
Misner, C. W., Thome, K. S., and Wheeler, J. A. (1973).Gravitation (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco)
Wheeler, J. T. (1989).Gen. Rel. Grav.,20, 659.
Komar, A. (1985).J. Math. Phys.,26, 831.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bradfield, T. A note on the physical interpretation of Weyl gauging. Gen Relat Gravit 22, 665–669 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755986
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755986