Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 22–34 | Cite as

Female masochism: Perspectives for social workers

  • Nora Dougherty
Articles
  • 51 Downloads

Abstract

Simplistic theories regarding the origin of female masochism fail to recognize its multidetermined nature. Object relations theory can combine with learning theory to elucidate the interpersonal quality of human behavior. In addition, social sciences concepts such as role and exchange theories may explain pressures on individuals and groups to behavior in culturally valued ways. Contradictions between popularly believed notions about femininity and the individual's life experiences create conflicts for females, resulting in lack of self-esteem, confusion, and self-defeating behavior. Masochism can be understood as a defensive maneuver to retain the good object and prevent abandonment.

Keywords

Social Science Social Worker Human Behavior Life Experience Relation Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. de Beauvoir, S. (1974).The second sex (trans. & ed. by H.M. Parshly). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  2. Deutsch, H. (1944).The psychology of women: A psychoanalytic interpretation. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  3. Dowling, C. (1981).The Cinderella complex: Women's hidden fear of independence. New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  4. Eichenbaum, L. & Orbach, S. (1983).What do women want? Exploding the myth of dependency. New York: Berkley Books.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1924). The economic problem of masochism. InThe standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (trans. from German, ed. James Strachey, with Anna Freud, assisted by Alix Strachey & Alan Tyson, Vol. XIX, 1923–1925). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-analysis. (1961).Google Scholar
  6. Gear, M. C., Hill, M. A., & Liendo, E. C. (1981).Working through narcissism: Treating its sadomasochistic structure, New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Horney, K. (1967).Feminine psychology. New York: W. W. Norton& Company.Google Scholar
  8. Katz, J. (1978). Masochism as resistance and defense. In S. Smith (Ed.),The human mind revisited. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lowenstein, R. M. (1957). Psychoanalytic theory of masochism.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 5.Google Scholar
  10. Marcus, M. (1981).A taste for pain: On masochism and female sexuality. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  11. Menaker, E. (1979). Masochism and the emergency ego: Selected papers of Esther Menaker. In L. Lerner (Ed.),Self-in-process series (Vol. III). New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  12. Miller, J. B. (1973).Psychoanalysis and women: Contributions to new theory and therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  13. Panken, S. (1973).The joy of suffering: Psychoanalytic theory and therapy of masochism. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
  14. Pogrebin, L. C. (1981).Growing up free: Raising your child in the 80s. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  15. Rohrbach, J. B. (1979).Women: Psychology's puzzle. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Rubin, J. Z., Provezano, J.J., & Luvia, Z. (1974). The eye of the beholder: Parents' views of sex of newborns.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44.Google Scholar
  17. Schad-Sommers, S. P. (1982).Sadomasochism: Etiology and treatment. New York: Human Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  18. Seiderberg, R. (1973). In anatomy destiny? In J. B. Miller (Ed.),Psychoanalysis and women: Contributions to new theory and therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  19. Seligman, M. E. P. (1975).Helplessness: On depression, development and death. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  20. Wallace, R. A., & Wolfe, A. (1980).Contemporary sociological theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence.Psychological Review, 66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nora Dougherty
    • 1
  1. 1.Atlanta

Personalised recommendations