Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 52–65 | Cite as

The renovative aspect of psychoanalytic reconstruction in psychotherapy

  • Joyce Edward
Articles
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Reconstruction of the origins of present day psychic phenomena constitutes an essential component of psychoanalytically oriented treatment. The clinician seeks to help restore to the patient a picture of the past and to correct or revise those early impressions that have been distorted as a result of cognitive immaturity or altered by the employment of defense, fantasy, or compensatory adaptations. It is this renovative aspects of reconstruction which will be elaborated upon, drawing from the treatment of a borderline woman who, since childhood, had overly employed the autoerotic resources of her body to compensate for missed object experiences. Ultimately this effort came to block her development, distort organization, and compromise self valuation. By tracing her polymorphous perversity in adulthood back to its origins, it was possible to enable her to regard her responses to chronic childhood trauma in a new light. This in turn aided in the revision of the predominantly negatively coloured self representations, leading to more positive development in the narcissistic sphere of her personality.

Keywords

Childhood Trauma Positive Development Object Experience Chronic Childhood Compensatory Adaptation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blanck, G., and Blanck, R. (1979).Ego psychology II, New York: University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Fingarette, H. (1963).The self in transformation, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Fremantle, A. (1954)The age of belief, New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, A. (1981).Psychoanalytic psychology of normal development, New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1900) The Interpretation of Dreams. In J. Strachey (Ed.).Standard Edition, London: Hogarth Press. 4 & 5.Google Scholar
  6. — (1909) “Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. In J. Strachey (Ed.),Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press,10:158–320.Google Scholar
  7. — (1913) The claims of psychoanalysis to scientific interest. In J. Strachey (Ed.).Standard Edition. London: Hogarth Press.13:165–190.Google Scholar
  8. — (1915) The unconscious. In. J. Strachey (Ed.)Standard Edition, London: Hogarth Press.14:159–215.Google Scholar
  9. — (1937) “Constructions in analysis”. In J. Strachey (Ed.)Standard Edition London: Hogarth Press.23:225–269.Google Scholar
  10. Greenacre, P. (1975). On reconstruction.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 20:27–46.Google Scholar
  11. — (1981) Reconstruction: its nature and therapeutic value.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 20:27–46.Google Scholar
  12. Hartmann, H. (1939–1948).Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jacobson, J. (1983) The structural theory and the representational world.The Psychoanalytic Quarterly.52:514–543.Google Scholar
  14. Joffe, W.G. and Sandler, J. (1968). Comments on the psychoanalytic psychology of adaptation.International Journal of Psychoanalysis.49:445–453.Google Scholar
  15. Kohut, H. (1977).The restoration of the self, New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kris, E. (1956). The personal myth, a problem in psychoanalytic technique,Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association.4:653–681.Google Scholar
  17. Mahler, M.S. (1968)On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mahler, M.S. Bergman, A. and Pine, F., (1975)The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Mahler, M.S. & Kaplan, L. (1977). Developmental aspects in the assessement of narcissistic and so-called borderline personalities. In P. Hartococollis (Ed.)Borderline Personality Disorders. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  20. Nunberg, H. (1931) The synthetic function of the ego.International Journal of psycho-analysis.12:123–40.Google Scholar
  21. Sandler, J. (1960) The background of safety,International Journal of Psychoanalysis.41:352–356.Google Scholar
  22. Sandler, J. & Sandler, A. (1983) The “second censorship”, the “three box model”.International Journal of Psychoanalysis.64:413–425.Google Scholar
  23. Shor, J. (1972) “Two principles of reparative regression: self-traumatization and self provocation”.The Psychoanalytic Review. 259–280.Google Scholar
  24. Shor, J. & Sanville, J. (1978)Illusion in loving. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, D. P. (1982).Narrative truth and historical truth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  26. Spitz, R. (1959)Field theory of ego formation, New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  27. — (1962) Auto-erotism re-examined.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. New York, International Universities Press.17:283–314.Google Scholar
  28. — (1965)The first year of life. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  29. Tuchman, B. W. (1981)Practicing history. New York: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
  30. Waelder, R. (1936) The principle of multiple function, observations on overdetermination.The Psychoanalytic quarter.5:45–62.Google Scholar
  31. Winnicott, D. W. (1969) The use of an object.International Journal of Psycho-Analysis.50:711–716.Google Scholar
  32. Young, J.Z. (1978)Programs of the brain. Oxford, Great Britain: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joyce Edward
    • 1
  1. 1.Freeport

Personalised recommendations