Abstract
Mahler's principle of separation-individuation, widely recognized as a useful tool for understanding couples' difficulties, has been applied traditionally in one-to-one psychotherapy with individual partners. In this article, the author illustrates the use of Mahler's schema in conjoint marital therapy. Following a theoretical elaboration, the author uses excerpts from case process notes to trace a couple's development in treatment from a level dominated by symbiotic longings and related ambivalence to one reflective of increased object constancy and empathic mutuality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanck, G., & Blanck, R. (1968).Marriage and personal development. New York: Columbia University Press.
Blanck, G., & Blanck, R. (1980) Separaton-individuation: An organizing principle. In R. F. Lax, S. Bach, & J. A. Burland (Eds.),Rapprochement: The critical subphase of separation-individuation (pp. 101–116). New York: Jason Aronson.
Boettcher, R. E. (1977). Interspousal empathy, marital satisfaction, and marriage counseling.Journal of Social Service Research, 1, 105–113.
Blos, P. (1967). The second individuation process of adolescence.The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 22, 162–186.
Calogeras, R. C. (1985). Early object-relations conflicts in marital interaction.The Psychoanalytic Review, 72, 31–53.
Crandall, J. W. (1984). The nurturant disparity factor in marital breakdown.Clinical Social Work Journal, 12, 216–224.
Edward, J. (1976). The therapist as a catalyst in promoting separation-individuation.Clinical Social Work Journal, 12, 216–224.
Edward, J., Ruskin, N., & Turrini, P. (1984).Separation-individuation: Theory and application. New York: Gardner Press.
Fogarty, T. F. (1984). The distancer and the pursuer. In E. G. Pendagast (Ed.),The family: Compendium II. New Rochelle, NY: Center for Family Learning.
Gurman, A., & Kniskern, D. (1978). The research on marital and family therapy: Progress, perspective and prospect. In A. Bergin & S. Garfield (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.), (pp. 817–901). New York: John Wiley.
Horner, A. J. (1979).Object relations and the developing ego in therapy. New York: Jason Aronson.
Kaneko, S. Y. (1984). The family system, temporary or permanent auxiliary ego: The differential fate of self-objects.Clinical Social Work Journal, 12, 303–319.
Kaplan, L. J. (1980). Rapprochement and oedipal organization: Effects on borderline phenomena. In R. Lax, S. Bach, & J. A. Burland (Eds.),Rapprochement: The critical subphase of separation-individuation (pp. 39–63). New York: Jason Aronson.
Kramer, S. (1979). The technical significance and application of Mahler's separation-individuation theory.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 27, 241–262.
Lichtenberg, J. D. (1983).Psychoanalysis and infant research. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Mahler, M. S. (1968).On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. New York: International Universities Press.
Mahler, M. S., Pine, F., & Bergman, A. (1975).The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.
Meissner, W. W. (1978). The conceptualization of marriage and family dynamics from a psychoanalytic perspective. In T. J. Paolino & B. S. McCrady (Eds.),Marriage and marital therapy: Psychoanalytic, behavioral and systems perspectives (pp. 25–88). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Stern, D. N. (1985).The interpersonal world of the infant. New York: Basic Books.
Winnicott, D. W. (1953). Transitional objects and transitional phenomena.The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34, 89–97.
Winnicott, D. W. (1965).The maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 29–36). New York: International Universities Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Applegate, J.S. Alone together: An application of separation-individuation theory to conjoint marital therapy. Clin Soc Work J 16, 418–429 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755150
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00755150