Skip to main content
Log in

Ego Psychology and Self Psychology in social work practice

  • Articles
  • Published:
Clinical Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ego Psychology and Self Psychology are compared by examining how each theory would imply different treatment techniques. These differences are discussed at both a theoretical level and in terms of their applications to the same case. At the level of theory, Mahler's and Kohut's views are compared along five dimensions: definition of the problem, motivation, conflict, the nature of the therapeutic process, and the therapist's role in that process. At the level of technique, specific attention is paid to when the differences aid or impede the therapeutic process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, H. and Baker, M. (1987). Heinz Kohut's self psychology: An overview.American Journal of Psychiatry, 144: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellow, G. (1986). Self psychology and ego psychology: A historical perspective.Clinical Social Work Journal, 14, 3 (Fall): 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanck, G. and Blanck, R. (1986).Beyond ego psychology, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, R. A. (Ed.) (1988).Paradigms of clinical social work, N.Y.: Brunner/Mazel

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, M. (1986).Self psychology in clinical social work. N.Y.: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. E. (1989).Therapist techniques and client outcomes. Newbury Park, CA. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, H. (1977).The restoration of the self. N.Y.: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1979). The two analyses of Mr. Z.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 60:3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1980). Reflections on advances in self psychology in A. Goldberg, ed.,Advances in self psychology. N.Y.: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984).How does analysis cure?. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, M., Pine, F., and Bergman, A. (1975).The psychological birth of the human infant. N.Y.: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, A. (1974). The dread to repeat and the new beginning: A contribution to the psychoanalysis of the narcissistic personality disorders.The Annual of Psychoanalysis. Vol. 11: 231–248. N.Y.: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, P. H. and Ornstein, A. (1985). Clinical understanding and explaining: The empathic vantage point, in A. Goldberg, ed.,Progress in self psychology, Vol. 1: 43–61. N.Y.: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R., Brandchaft, B., and Atwood, G. (1987).Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach. Hillsdale, N.J.: The Analytic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. (1977). ‘Irrationality’ in a psychoanalytic psychology of the self, in T. Mischel, ed.,The self: psychological and philosophical issues. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1988).Treating the self. N.Y.: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. (1988). The development and disturbance of emotion: An application of self psychology to clinical work with children.Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 5, 4:245–68.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pessein, D.E., Young, T.M. Ego Psychology and Self Psychology in social work practice. Clin Soc Work J 21, 57–70 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754912

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754912

Keywords

Navigation