Skip to main content
Log in

A typology for the classification of disasters: Implications for intervention

  • Articles
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A model that can be used to plan for disaster intervention services is presented. The model, which is based upon an ability to classify disasters, presents four dichotomous categories for intervention: (1) psychotherapeutic vs. educational, (2) individual vs. systems, (3) prevention vs. treatment, and (4) direct vs. indirect. The article presents a rationale for determining which intervention, or combination, would be appropriate for any given disaster, based on its classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, K. The behavior of survivors and victims in a Japanese nightclub fire.Mass Emergencies, 1976,1, 119–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bard, M., & Sangrey, D. Things fall apart: Victims in crisis.Evaluation and Change, 1980, Special Issue, 28–35.

  • Berren, M.R., Beigel, A., & Ghertner, S. A case study of providing emergency mental health services immediately after an aircraft accident. Paper presented at the Western Psychological Association Meeting, San Diego, Calif., 1979.

  • Berren, M.R., Beigel, A., & Ghertner, S. A typology for the classification of disasters.Community Mental Health Journal, Summer, 1980,16(2), 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R., Copion, J., & Scharff, I. Crisis intervention after a natural disaster.Social Casework, 1973,54(9), 545–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, J.C. Emergency mental health services during and after a major aircraft accident.Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 1978,49, 1004–1008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, K.T.Everything in its path: Destruction of community in Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, C. Effects of natural vs. human-induced violence upon victims.Evaluation and Change, 1980, Special Issue, 71–75.

  • Heffron, E.F. Project outreach: Crisis intervention following a natural disaster.Journal of Community Psychology, 1977,5, 103–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linderman, E.: Symptomatology and management of acute grief. In: H. J. Parado (Ed.),Crisis intervention: Selected readings. New York: Family Service Association of America, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H.E.Tornadoes over Texas: A study of WACO and San Angelo in disaster. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okura, K. Mobilizing in response to a major disaster.Community Mental Health Journal, 1975,11, 136–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard, W. Crisis intervention services following natural disasters: The Pennsylvania flood recovery project.Journal of Community Psychology, 1974,2, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, M. Acute responses of victims to terror.Evaluation and Change, 1980a, Special Issue, 36–38.

  • Symonds, M. The “second injury” to victims.Evaluation and Change, 1980b, Special Issue, 39–41.

  • Tyhurst, J.S. Individual reactions to community disaster.American Journal of Psychiatry, 1951,107, 764–769.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berren, M.R., Beigel, A. & Barker, G. A typology for the classification of disasters: Implications for intervention. Community Ment Health J 18, 120–134 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754456

Keywords

Navigation