Advertisement

Clinical Social Work Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 156–164 | Cite as

Boredom: Exploration of a developmental perspective

  • Martha A. Gabriel
Articles

Abstract

This article presents an examination of the phenomenon of boredom in adults and searches for a developmental explanation for boredom by using clues from the cumulative literature on boredom, clinical interviews with bored adults and findings from infant observational studies. The author attempts to link behaviors observed in infant research with the phenomenon of adult boredom toward the goal of contributing to a more precise meaning of this state of mind in both the patient and the therapist.

Keywords

Observational Study Clinical Interview Developmental Perspective Precise Meaning Infant Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altshul, V. (1977). The so-called boring patient.American Journal of Psychotherapy, 31, 533–545.Google Scholar
  2. Bergler, E. (1945). On the disease-entity boredom (alysois) and its psychopathology.Psychiatric Quarterly, 19, 38–51.Google Scholar
  3. Bibring, E. (1953). The mechanisms of depression. Phyllis Greenacre (Ed.),Affective Disorders. New York: International Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bieber, I. (1951). Pathological boredom and inertia.American Journal of Psychotherapy, I, 215–225.Google Scholar
  5. Burchfield, R. W. (1971).A Supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eisnitz, A. (1974). Discussion of the paper by J.J. Weinberger and J.J. Muller on the “American icarus revisited; phallic narcissism and boredom.”International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 55, 587–590.Google Scholar
  7. Fenichel, O. (1934). On the psychology of boredom. David Rapaport, Ed.,Collected papers of Otto Fenichel. New York: W. W. Norton Co.Google Scholar
  8. Greenson, R. (1953). On boredom.Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 1, 7–21.Google Scholar
  9. Joffee, W. G. & Sandler, J. (1965). Notes on pain, depression and individuation.The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 20, 394–424.Google Scholar
  10. Kernberg, O. (1970). Factors in the psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personalities.Journal of American Psychoanalytic Association, 18, 51–84.Google Scholar
  11. Kernberg, O. (1975).Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jason Aronson, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Kohut, H. (1971).The analysis of self. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhn, R. (1976).The demon of noontide (ennui in western literature). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Mahler, M. (1968).On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. New York: International University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Mahler, M., Pine, F. & Bergman, A. (1975).The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  16. Rubinfine, D. (1961). Perception, reality testing and symbolism.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 73–88.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, R. F. (1981). Boredom: a review.Human Factors, 23, 329–340.Google Scholar
  18. Stuart, M. (1951). Boredom in a case of depression.Psychiatric Quarterly, 20, 346–349.Google Scholar
  19. Wangh, M. (1979). Some psychoanalytic observations on boredom.International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 60, 515–524.Google Scholar
  20. Weinberger, J. & Muller, J. (1974). The American icarus revisited: Phallic narcissism and boredom.International Journal of Psycho-analysis, 55, 581–586.Google Scholar
  21. Windholz, 3. (1935). Types of boredom and their dynamics.Psychiatric Quarterly, 21, 345.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha A. Gabriel
    • 1
  1. 1.New York

Personalised recommendations