Skip to main content
Log in

Citizen participation in CMHC program evaluation: A neglected potential

  • Articles
  • A Special Issue of Citizen Participation in Community Mental Health Services
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rationale for involving citizens in CMHC planning and evaluation is presented from three perspectives: (1) values, (2) responsiveness to the community, and (3) utilization of evaluative findings. Current practices in citizen involvement in CMHC evaluation are reviewed and several examples are given. Seven roles citizens can play in CMHC evaluation are described. Data indicating that citizens can provide useful, relevant information and recommendations which can lead to positive changes in the CMHC are offered. The paper concludes that citizen participation in CMHC evaluation occurs infrequently and presents suggestions as to how this situation can be remedied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, M., & Hage, J. Organizational interdependence and interorganizational structure.American Sociological Review, December 1968,33(6), 912–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford, R. R.Health care politics: Ideological and interest group barriers to reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertelsen, K., & Harris, M. R. Citizen participation in the development of a community mental health center.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1973,4(3), 533–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfield, M. B., Olds, M. L., Shreve, B. W., Smith, M., & Schoenberger, V. E.Citizen evaluation with program analysis of service systems. Lancaster County Office of Mental Health/Mental Retardation, 1978.

  • Borus, J. F., & Klerman, G. L. Consumer-professional collaboration for evaluation in neighborhood mental health programs.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 1976,27(6), 401–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. K. Clients' resistance to negative findings and the latent conservative function of evaluation studies.The American Sociologist Journal, 1971,6(2), 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, F. B., & Trotter, S.The madness establishment. New York: Grossman, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, R. B.Utilizing consumer input in evaluating mental health services. Paper presented to the Conference on Impact of Program Evaluation on Mental Health Care, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois, 1977.

  • Flaherty, E., & Olsen, K.An assessment of the utility of federally Required Program Evaluation in Community Mental Health Centers. Philadelphia Health Management Corporation, 1978. [NIMH Contract No. 278-77-0067 (MH)]

  • Flaherty, E., & Windle, C. D.Lessons learned from past federal evaluation policy for community mental health centers: Framework for a new policy. Unpublished manuscript. Philadelphia Health Management Corporation, 1979.

  • Garrison, P. Executive Director, Florida Division of the Mental Health Association, 132 East Colonial Drive, Orlando, Florida 32801. Personal Communication, July, 1980.

  • Gordon, G., & Marquis, S. Freedom, visibility of consequences, and scientific innovation.American Journal of Sociology, September 1966,72(2), 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurel, L. The human side of evaluating human services programs. In M. Guttentag & E. Struening (Eds.),Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2) Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, H. J., Beck, K. J., Neubert, S. F., & Werlin, S. H.A Working Manual of Simple Program Evaluation Techniques for Community Mental Health Centers. (DHEW Publication (ADM) 76-404). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, R. J. Working with community groups. In R. Hammer, G. Landsberg, & W. Neigher, (Eds.),Program evaluation in community mental health centers. Brooklyn, New York: Maimonides CMHC, February 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessler, R. M. & Walters, M. J. Consumer evaluation research: Implications for methodology, social policy, and the role of the sociologist.The Sociological Quarterly, Winter 1976,17, 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, P. Evaluation and accountability in a parent-implemented early intervention service.Community Mental Health Journal, 1977,13(3), 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstra, R. K., Lubin, B., Lewis, R. V. & Willis, B. S. Worlds apart: Patients and Professionals.Archives of General Psychiatry, October 1972,27, 553–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I.,Medical nemesis: The expropriation of health. New York: Random House, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, R., & Brill, M.National Institute of Mental Health Planning Aid Kit. National Institute of Mental Health, January 1971,

  • Landsberg, G., Hammer, R., & Neigher, W.Analyzing the evaluation activities in CMHCs in NIMH Region II. Paper presented at the 1978 Annual Meeting of the National Council of CMHCs, Kansas City, Missouri. February, 1978.

  • MacMurray, V. D., Cunningham, P. H., Cater, P. B., Swenson, N., & Bellins, S. S.,Citizen evaluation of mental health services: An action approach to accountability. New York: Human Sciences Press, Behavioral Publication, Inc., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogulof, M. B. Advocates for themselves: Citizen participation in federally supported community organizations.Community Mental Health Journal, 1974,10(1), 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morentz, P. E. A citizen-conducted evaluation of aceeptability: The Ronoh School evaluation committee. In G. Landsberg, W. D. Neigher, R. J. Hammer, C. Windle & J. R. Woy (Eds.),Evaluation in practice: A sourcebook of program evaluation studies from mental health care systems in the United States. (DHEW Publication No. (ADM) 80-763). Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, J. K. & Gaviria, B. The role of the client-consumer in the delivery of psychiatric services. In J. K. Morrison (Ed.),A consumer approach to community psychology, Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller C. The over medicated society: Forces in the market place for medical care.Science, May 5, 1972,176, 488–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassi, A. J. Community control or control of the community? The case of the community mental health center.Journal of Community Psychology, 1978,6, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olander, F., & Lindhoff, H. Consumer action research: A review of the consumerism literature and suggestions for new directions in research.Social Science Information, 1975,14, 147–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, S., Lichtman, S. A., & Windle, C.Citizen roles in community mental health center evaluation: A guide for citizens. (DHEW Publication No. (ADM) 79-789). Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premo, F. Personal Communication, April 1980.

  • Skodol, A. E., Plutchik, R. & Karasu, T. B. Expectations of hospital treatment: Conflicting views of patients and staff.The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 1980,168(2), 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, R. M., Wilson, N. Z., Ellis, R. H., & Mumpower, J.Dimensions of mental health treatment goals: A tri-informant conception. Fort Logan Mental Health Center, 1974. (Unpublished Manuscript)

  • Thomson, R. The why's and why'not's of consumer participation.Community Mental Health Journal, 1973,9(2), 143–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office.Need for more effective management of community mental health center programs. Washington, D.C., August, 1974.

  • Weiss, C., Monroe, J., Bray, C., David, H., & Hunt, B. Evaluation by citizens. In R. Coursey (Ed.),Program evaluation for mental health. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, C. The citizen as part of the management process. In H. C. Schulberg & Jerrell, J. M. (Eds.),The evaluator and management. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, D., & Neigher, W. Ethical problems in program evaluation: Advice for trapped evaluators.Evaluation and Program Planning, 1978,1(2), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle, C., & Volkman, E. M. Evaluation in the center's program.Evaluation and Change, 1973,1(2), 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfensberger, W., & Glenn, L.PASS: A method for the quantitative evaluation of human services.Field manual 3rd. edition. National Institute of Mental Retardation, Toronto, Canada, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K., Lucas, W. A., Stanton, P. L., & Spindler, J. A.Citizen organizations: Increasing client control over serices. Santa Monica, California: The Rand Corporation, 1973. (NTIS No. PB 240 456).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinober, J. W., Dinkel, N. R., Landsberg, G., & Windle, C. Another role for citizens: Three variations of citizen evaluation review, Community Mental Health Journal, 16(4), 1980.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Much of the material in this paper is based on the work of NIMH Contract No. MH 278-77-0067, Eugenie Walsh Flaherty, Principal Investigator, and NIMH Grant number MH 28784, Joan Wagner Zinober, Principal Investigator.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dinkel, N.R., Zinober, J.W. & Flaherty, E.W. Citizen participation in CMHC program evaluation: A neglected potential. Community Ment Health J 17, 54–65 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754209

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754209

Keywords

Navigation