Abstract
This paper, based on the results of a national study of experienced clinical social workers, focuses on the nature of theoretical perspectives, practice models, and modes of clinical intervention. The majority of respondents identified ego psychology as being most instrumental to their approach with socio-cultural, cognitive/behavioral and family systems theories having an important secondary influence. Most identified with the psychosocial model of practice with problem-solving and family therapy being instrumental secondary models. Specific modes of clinical work were examined in relation to these theories and models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cohen J. (1980). The nature of clinical social work,Toward a definition of clinical social work, in P. Wealt,NASW, 23–32.
Haley, J. (1976).Problem-solving therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Lazare, A. (1978). Hidden conceptual models in clinical psychiatry,The New England Journal of Medicine, 288 345–351.
Mackey, R. (1985).Ego psychology and clinical practice, New York: Gardner Press, Inc.
Mackey, R. (1974).Role complexity in clinical practice, Unpublished paper.
Madanes, C. (1981).Strategic family therapy, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
Mann, J. (1973).Time Limited Psychotherapy, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Siporin, M. (1985). “Current Social Work Perspectives on Clinical Practice,”Clinical Social Work Journal, 13, 98–117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mackey, R.A., Burek, M. & Charkoudian, S. The relationship of theory to clinical practice. Clin Soc Work J 15, 368–383 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752974
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752974