Abstract
Ego psychology adds a valuable dimension to classical psychoanalytic theory and technique by illuminating some of the factors that shape the development of self and object representations. Insight into identity formation can, in some cases, uncover preverbal determinants that create obstacles to oedipal resolution. This is illustrated in an analytic case that reached an impasse during the termination phase, which was resolved when the preverbal component of this resistance was recognized and interpreted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanck, G. & Blanck, R. (1974).Ego psychology: Theory and practice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Blanck, G. & Blanck, R. (1979).Ego psychology II: Psychoanalytic developmental psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Blanck, G. (1984). The complete Oedipus complex.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 65, 331–339.
Eissler, K. (1953). The effect of the structure of the ego on psychoanalytic technique.Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, I. 104–143.
Freud, A. (1946),The ego and mechanisms of defense, New York: International Universities Press.
Freud, S. (1924a). The dissolution of the Oedipus complex.Standard Edition, 19. London: Hogarth Press, 1961.
Hartmann, H. (1958).Ego psychology and the problem of adaptation. New York: International Universities Press.
Jacobson, E. (1964).The self and the object world. New York: International Universities Press.
Mahler, M. (1968).On human symbiosis and the vicissitudes of individuation. New York: International Universities Press.
Spitz, R. (1965).The first year of life. New York: International Universities Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siskind, D. An example of preverbal determinants in a classical analysis. Clin Soc Work J 15, 361–367 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752973
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752973