Advertisement

Fertilizer research

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 169–175 | Cite as

Use of nitrification inhibitors (neem and DCD) to increase N efficiency in maize-wheat cropping system

  • S. N. Sharma
  • R. Prasad
Article

Abstract

A 2-year field experiment was conducted to study the effects of the nitrification inhibitors dicyandiamide (DCD) and neem cake on the efficiency of applied prilled urea nitrogen in a maize-wheat cropping system. Prilled urea (PU), neem cake coated urea (NCU) and DCD blended urea (DCDU) were applied to maize at two levels (60 and 120 Kg N ha−1) and two methods (all preplant and split) of N application along with a no-nitrogen control and their relative residual effect was studied on succeeding wheat grown with three levels of N as PU.

In 1990 maize responded well to N up to 60 kg N ha−1; at this level PU increased maize yield by 1.03 t ha−1, whereas NCU and DCDU increased maize yield by 1.55 and 1.18 t ha−1 over the control, which was equivalent to an application of 127 and 94 kg N ha−1 as PU, respectively. Furthermore, when the results were averaged over two years of study, residual N from the application of NCU and DCDU at 60 kg N ha−1 left after maize cropping increased the grain yield of the succeeding wheat crop grown with 60 kg N ha−1 as PU by 1.97 and 1.68 t ha−1, respectively, over a no nitrogen control or 60 kg N ha−1 as PU applied to the maize. This was equal to an application of 96 and 82 kg N ha−1 as PU to wheat.

Thus, neem cake increased the efficiency of urea N applied to maize and benefits were also seen in the succeeding wheat yield in the maize-wheat cropping system.

Key words

neem cake dicyandiamide prilled urea nitrogen response residual N response 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amberger A (1981) Dicyandiamide as a nitrification inhibitor. Technical Workshop on Dicyandiamide. Muscle Shoals, Alabama. December 4–5, 1981, pp. 3–17Google Scholar
  2. Amberger A and Gutser R (1978) Umsatz und Wirkung von Harnstoff-dicyandiamid sowie Ammoniumsulfat-dicyandiamid Production zu Weidelgras und Reis. Z Pflanzenern u Bodenkd 141: 553–566Google Scholar
  3. Bronson KF, Touchton JT and Hauck RD (1989) Decomposition rate of dicyandiamide and nitrification inhibition. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal 20: 2067–2078Google Scholar
  4. Bronson KF, Mosier AR and Bishnoi SR (1992) Nitrous oxide emissions in irrigated corn as affected by nitrification inhibitors. Soil Sci. Soc Am J 56: 161–165Google Scholar
  5. Fox RH and Bandel VA (1989) Dicyandiamide (DCD) research in agriculture in the mid-Atlantic region. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 20: 1957–1968Google Scholar
  6. Gomez KA and Gomez AA (1984) Statistical procedure for Agricultural Research, Second edition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Ingty PW (1984) Studies on plant population and planting geometry under graded levels of soil applied nitrogen in maize and the residual effect on wheat for a maize-wheat cropping system, Ph.D. Thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. Kick H and Massen GG (1973) Der Einfluss von dicyandiamid und N-Serve in Verbindung mit Ammoniumsulfat auf Nitratund Oxalsauregehalt von Spinat. Z Pflanzenern u Bodenkde 135: 220–225Google Scholar
  9. Malzer GL, Kelling KA, Schmitt MA, Hoeft RG and Randall GW (1989) Performance of dicyandiamide in the North Central States. Commun. Soil Sci Plant Anal 20: 2001–2022Google Scholar
  10. Mc Carty GW and Bremner JM (1989) Laboratory evaluation of dicyandiamide as a soil nitrification inhibitor. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 20: 2049–2065Google Scholar
  11. Prasad R (1982) A practical manual for soil fertility. New Delhi: Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  12. Prasad M and Prasad R (1980) Yield and nitrogen uptake by rice as affected by variety, method of planting and new fertilizers. Fert Res 1: 207–213Google Scholar
  13. Prasad R, Rajale GB and Lakhdive BA (1971) Nitrification retarders and slow-release nitrogen fertilizers Adv Agron 23: 337–383Google Scholar
  14. Randall GW and Malzer GL (1981) Crop production in south central Minnesota as influenced by dicyandiamide (DCD). Technical Workshop on Dicyandiamide, Muscle Shoals, Alabama. December 4–5, 1981, pp. 38–46Google Scholar
  15. Reddy RNS and Prasad R (1975) Studies on the mineralization of urea, coated urea and nitrification inhibitors treated urea in soil. J Soil Sci 26: 304–312Google Scholar
  16. Sharma SN and Prasad R (1980) Effects of rates of nitrogen and relative efficiency of sulphur coated urea and nitrapyrin treated urea in dry matter production and nitrogen uptake by rice. Plant soil 55: 389–396Google Scholar
  17. Subhiah BV and Sachdev MS (1981) Fate of fertilizer nitrogen in soil-plant system - quantitative approach using15N as a tracer. Fert News 26: 31–35Google Scholar
  18. Thomas J and Prasad R (1983) Mineralization of urea, coated urea and nitrification inhibitor treated urea in different rice growing soils. Z Pflanzen u Bodenkd 146: 341–347Google Scholar
  19. Vilsmeier K (1980) Dicyandiamidabbau im Boden in Abhangigkeit von der Temperatur. Z Pflanzen u Bodenkd. 143: 113–118Google Scholar
  20. Vilsmeier K and Amberger A (1978) Modell- und Gefassversuche zur nitrifikationshemmenden Wirkung von Dicyandiamid. Landw. Forsch. Sonderheft Kongressband 35: 243–248Google Scholar
  21. Walters DT and Malzer GL (1990) Nitrogen management and nitrification inhibitor effects on nitrogen15 urea: yield and fertilizer use efficiency. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 54: 115–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. N. Sharma
    • 1
  • R. Prasad
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of AgronomyIndian Agricultural Research InstituteNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations