Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-part conception of group identity is proposed that draws on common fate, cohesiveness, and cognitive views of group identity. The changing contribution of these three components to group identity was examined for 31 original and 29 reconfigured groups which met for 7 consecutive weeks using either face-to-face (FIF) or computer-mediated communication (CMC). Group identity was consistently lower for computer-mediated groups, and this effect was stronger in the reconfigured groups. In the original groups, group identity started high and declined for both FTF and CMC groups. In the reconfigured groups, developmental patterns differed from those of the original groups, and also differed by communication medium. Individual differences accounted for a substantial amount of variance in group identity across original and reconfigured groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anson, R. (1990): Effects of computer support and facilitator support on group processes and outcomes: An experimental assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington. Cited in Brian E. Mennecke, Jeffrey A. Hoffer, and Bayard E. Wynne (1992). The implications of group development and history for group support system theory and practice.Small Group Research, vol. 23, pp. 524–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argote, Linda and McGrath, Joseph E. (1993): Group process in organizations: Continuity and change. In C. Cooper and I. T. Robertson (Eds.)International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, vol. 8, pp. 333–389, London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, David J. and Cole, Paul (in press): Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In Susan E. Jackson and Marian N. Ruderman (Eds.),Work team diversity: Paradigms and perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Arrow, Holly (in preparation): The development and transmission of group culture in growing organizations founded by women and men. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

  • Arrow, Holly (1995): Mapping the structural dynamics of groups: Patterns of leadership and influence over time in work groups with changing membership. Unpublished masters thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Holly and McGrath, Joseph E. (1994): Membership dynamics in groups at work: A theoretical framework. In Barry M. Staw and Larry L. Cummings (Eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 17, pp. 373–411. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, Vairam and Dilla, William N. (1992): Computer-mediated communication and structured interaction in transfer pricing negotiation.Journal of Information System, vol. 6, pp. 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1984):The evolution of cooperation, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Marilynn B. (in press): Managing diversity: Can we reap the benefits without paying the costs? In Susan E. Jackson and Marian N. Ruderman (Eds.),Work team diversity: Paradigms and perspectives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Brewer, Marilynn B. (1991): The social self: On being the same and different at the same time.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 17, pp. 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Marilynn B. and Kramer, Roderick M. (1986): Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 50, pp. 543–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinberg, David and McGrath, Joseph E. (1985):Validity and the research process. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Donald T. and Stanley, Julian C. (1963):Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Co.: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, Dorwin (1968): The nature of group cohesiveness. In Dorwin Cartwright and Alvin Zander (Eds.),Group dynamics: Research and theory (3d ed.) New York: Harper and Row, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Xiao-Ping (1995): The group-based binding pledge as a solution to public goods problems. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chidambaram, Laku, Bostrum, Robert P. and Wynne, Bayard E. (1991): The impact of GDSS on group development.Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 7, pp. 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Thomas D. and Campbell, Donald T. (1979):Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin Co.: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J. and Feldman, Stanely (1984): Group identification, values, and the nature of political beliefs.American Politics Quarterly, vol. 12, pp. 151–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, Richard L. and Lengel, Robert H. (1986): Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design.Management Science, vol. 32, pp. 554–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, Robyn M., McTavish, Jeanne and Shaklee, Harriet (1977) Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situtation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 35, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, Kay, Reid, Anne, Mizrahi Kim and Ethier, Kathleen A. (1995): Parameters of social identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 68, pp. 280–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeSanctis, Gerardine, Poole, M. Scott, Lewis, H. and Desharnais George (1991): Using computing in quality team meetings: Initial observations from the IRS-Minnesota Project.Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 8, pp. 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, Samuel L., Mann, Jeffrey A., Murrell, Audrey J. and Dovidio, John F. (1989): Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 57, pp. 239–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Wm. Fawcett, and Gruner, LeRoy (1973): A study of development in open and closed groups.Small Group Behavior, vol. 4, pp. 355–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle, Steve, Taylor, Laurie A., Fox-Cardamone, D. Lee and Crook, Kimberley (1989): Imtragroup identification and intergroup differentiation: A multicomponent approach.British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 28, pp. 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, Michael (1992):The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, Michael A. and Abrams, Dominic (1988):Social identifications. New York: Routledge, Chapman, and Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, Andrea B., McGrath, Joseph E. and O'Connor, Kathleen M. (1993): Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face groups.Small Group Research, vol. 24, pp. 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Janice R., Futuron, Gail C. and McGrath, Joseph E. (1990): Capacity and capability: Seven studies of entrainment of task performance rates.Small Group Research, vol. 21, pp. 283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Norb L. and Kaufman-Gilliland, Cynthia M. (1994): Communication, commitment, and cooperation in social dilemmas.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 66, pp. 513–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, Sara, Zubrow, David, Moses, A. M. and Geller, V. (1985): Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion.Human Computer Interaction, vol. 1, pp. 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Roderick M. and Brewer, Marilynn B. (1984): Effects of group identity on resource use in a simulated commons dilemma.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 1044–1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R. (1989): Individual and contextual influences on group identification.Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 52, pp. 220–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maples, Mary F. (1988): Group development: Extending Tuckman's theory.Journal for specialists in group work, vol. 13, pp. 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus-Newhall, Amy, Miller, Norman, Holtz, Rolf and Brewer, Marilynn B. (1993): Cross-cutting category membership with role assignment: A means of reducing intergroup bias.British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Joseph E. (1984).Groups: Interaction and performance Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Joseph E. (1991): Time, interaction, and performance: A theory of groups.Small Group Research, vol. 22, pp. 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Joseph E. (1993): The JEMCO Workshop: Description of a longitudinal study.Small Group Research, vol. 24, pp. 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Joseph E. and Arrow, Holly (1996): Introduction: The JEMCO-2 study of time, technology, and groups.Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) vol. 4, pp. 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, Joseph E. and Hollingshead, Andrea B. (1994):Groups interacting with technology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMurrain, T. Thomas and Gazda, George M. (1974): Extended group interaction: Interpersonal functioning as a developmental process variable.Small Group Behavior, vol. 5, pp. 393–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., Gurin, Patricia, Gurin, Gerald, and Malanchuk, Oksana (1981): Group consciousness and political participation.American Journal of Political Science, vol. 25, pp. 494–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, Richard L. and Levine, John M. (1988): Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In Joseph E. McGrath (Ed.).The social psychology of time: New perspectives Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Henry A. (1962 [1938]):Explorations in personality. New York: Science Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seashore, Stanley E. (1954):Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spears, Russell, Lea, Martin and Lee, Stephen (1990): De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communication.British Journal of Social Psychology vol. 29, pp. 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, Susan G. and McGrath, Joseph E. (1994): Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions.Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 79, pp. 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri and Turner, John C. (1979): An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.)The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, Harry C. (1994):Culture and social behavior. McGraw-Hill, Inc.: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, Harry C., McCusker, Christopher and Hui, C. Harry (1990): Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 59, pp. 1006–1020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, Bruce W. (1965): Developmental sequence in small groups.Psycholgical Bulletin vol. 63, pp. 384–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, Bruce W. and Jensen, Mary Ann C. (1977): Stages of small-group development revisited.Group & Organization Studies, vol. 2, pp. 419–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, John C., Hogg, Michael, Oakes, Penelope J., Reicher, Stephen and Wetherall, Margaret (1987),Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, Joseph B. and Burgoon, Judee K. (1992): Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction.Human Communication Research, vol. 19, pp. 50–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, David A., and Shapiro, Peter N. (1984): Role of outgroup cues in determining social identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 342–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaccaro, Stephen J. and Lowe, Charles A. (1988): Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality.The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 128 pp. 547–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 603 East Daniel Street, 61820, Champaign, IL, USA

    Kelly S. Bouas & Holly Arrow

Authors
  1. Kelly S. Bouas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holly Arrow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouas, K.S., Arrow, H. The development of group identity in computer and face-to-face groups with membership change. Comput Supported Coop Work (CSCW) 4, 153–178 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00749745

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00749745

Key words

Search

Navigation