Advertisement

Fertilizer research

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 213–221 | Cite as

Needs for controlled-availability micronutrient fertilizers

  • J. J. Mortvedt
Article

Abstract

Use of micronutrients for agronomic and horticultural crops has increased markedly in recent years. Increased use is related to higher nutrient demands from more intensive cropping practices and also from farming marginal lands. Most of the fertilizers used to correct micronutrient deficiencies are water- soluble inorganic sources or soluble organic products such as synthetic chelates or natural organic complexes. These fertilizers may react with soil to decrease their availability to plants. The rates of such chemical reactions may differ considerably with each micronutrient fertilizer and soil environment.

Recommended micronutrient rates have been based on results of numerous experiments, and these rates vary with crop, soil, and other factors. The usual application rates (on an elemental basis) range from 1 to 10 kg ha−1 for Cu, Fe, Mn and Zn; < 1 kg ha−1 for B; and < 100 g ha−1 for Mo.

Because the metallic micronutrients (Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn) generally are sorbed strongly by soil clays, they do not move significantly in soil. Hence, they are not leached readily from the zone of application to lower soil depths or into groundwaters. Mobility of these micronutrient cations is higher in sandy soils, especially with high leaching conditions. Therefore, their movement out of the root zone is possible under some situations. Significant residual effects of soluble Cu and Zn sources greatly reduce the need for controlled-availability Cu and Zn products. Controlled-availability Fe and Mn fertilizers have not been effective because the rapid oxidation of Fe and Mn and reactions with soil reduce their availability upon release.

Because soluble B fertilizers form boric acid molecules in soil, they are mobile and subject to leaching conditions. While mobility of B is less than that of NO 3 - -N in soil, field results have demonstrated loss of applied B from the root zone in sandy soils. Slightly soluble B fertilizers, such as colemanite and ulexite, and fritted B products (powdered glass-like materials whose solubility is controlled by particle size) have been used in sandy soils for some crops.

Molybdenum requirements are much lower than those of the other micronutrients. Deficiencies generally are corrected by liming the soil or by seed or foliar applications, so there is little need for controlled-availability Mo fertilizers.

Little research has been conducted on controlled availability micronutrient fertilizers. While fritted products are considered in this category, they are difficult to handle and only may be of value in supplying B under specific conditions. Coating soluble granular micronutrient fertilizers also has been attempted, but there are few reported results of their relative effectiveness in comparison with conventional fertilizers and application methods. New micronutrient products may be needed for specific conditions such as greenhouse-culture or container-grown crops, but plant needs also may be met by multiple applications of soluble sources.

Key words

coated fertilizers fritted products slightly soluble sources 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen SE (1984) Slow release nitrogen fertilizers.In Hauck RD (ed) Nitrogen in Crop Production, pp 195–206. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WiscGoogle Scholar
  2. Boawn LC (1971) Residual availability of fertilizer zinc. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 38: 800–803Google Scholar
  3. Bridger GL, Salutsky ML and Starostka RW (1962) Metal ammonium phosphates. J Agric Food Chem 10: 181–188Google Scholar
  4. Eaton FM (1932) Boron requirements of cotton. Soil Sci 34: 301–305Google Scholar
  5. Goldberg SA (1993) Chemistry and mineralogy of boron in soils.In Gupta UC (ed) Boron and its Role in Crop Production, pp. 3–44. CRC Press, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  6. Harter RD (1991) Micronutrient adsorption-desorption reactions in soils.In: Mortvedt JJet al. (eds) Micronutrients in Agriculture. Second ed., pp 59–87. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
  7. Holden ER (1950) Relationship of surface area and particle- size distribution of borosilicate glasses to boron status in alfalfa. J Agric Food Chem. 7: 756–762Google Scholar
  8. Holden ER and Hill WL (1958) Effect of composition and reactivity of borosilicate glass on boron status of alfalfa. J Agric Food Chem 6: 531–536Google Scholar
  9. Holden ER and Brown JW (1965) Influence of slowly soluble, soluble and chelated zinc on zinc content and yield of alfalfa. J Agric Food Chem 13: 180–184Google Scholar
  10. Holden ER, Page NR and Wear JI (1962) Properties and use of micronutrient glasses in crop production. J Agric Food Chem 10: 188–192Google Scholar
  11. Hortenstine CC, Ashley DA and Wear JI (1958) An evaluation of slowly soluble boron materials. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 22: 249–251Google Scholar
  12. Kidder G and Rhue RD (1983) Interpretations of micronutrient soil tests. Notes in Soil Science No. 9, Univ. of Florida, IFAS and Fla Coop Ext Svc, Gainesville, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  13. Kittams HA and Attoe OJ (1965) Availability of phosphorus in rock phosphate-sulfur fusions. Agron J 57: 331–334Google Scholar
  14. Ludwick AE, Sharpee KW and Attoe OJ (1968) Manganese-sulfur fusions as a source of manganese for crops. Agron J 60: 232–234Google Scholar
  15. McIntyre GH (1954) Ceramic fertilizers. Am Ceram Soc Bull 33(12): 358–360Google Scholar
  16. Mortvedt JJ (1968) Availability of boron in various boronated fertilizers. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 32: 433–437Google Scholar
  17. Mortvedt JJ (1991) Micronutrient fertilizer technology.In: Mortvedt JJet al. (eds) Micronutrients in Agriculture. Second ed, pp 523–548. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
  18. Mortvedt JJ and Osborn G (1965) Boron concentrations adjacent to fertilizer granules in soil, and its effect on root growth. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 29: 187–191Google Scholar
  19. Mortvedt JJ, Mikkelsen RL and Behel AD (1992a) Grain sorghum response to granular formulations of hydrophilic polymers. J Plant Nutr 15: 1913–1926Google Scholar
  20. Mortvedt JJ, Mikkelsen RL and Kelsoe JJ (1992b) Crop response to ferrous sulfate in banded gels of hydrophilic polymers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56: 1319–1324Google Scholar
  21. Natt C (1992) Effect of slow release iron fertilizers on chlorosis in grape. J Plant Nutr 15: 1891–1912Google Scholar
  22. Page NR and Cooper HP (1955) Less soluble boron compounds for correcting boron nutritional deficiencies. J Agric Food Chem 3: 222–223Google Scholar
  23. Rowell AWG and Grant PM (1975) A comparison of fertilizer borate and colemanite incorporated in granular fertilizers. Rhod. J Agric Res 13: 63–66Google Scholar
  24. Ryan J and Prasad JD (1979) Factors affecting release and plant availability of sulfur-coated micronutrients. Soil Sci Soc Am J 43: 1039–1043Google Scholar
  25. Sharpee KW, Ludwick AE and Attoe OJ (1969) Availability of zinc, copper, and iron in fusions with sulfur. Agron J 61: 746–749Google Scholar
  26. Terman GL and Brown BA (1958) Crop response to boronated fused tricalcium phosphates. Soil Sci 86: 47–53Google Scholar
  27. Watkinson JH (1992) Application of selenium to pasture. Proc. Trace Elements in Ruminants. New Zealand Veterinary Association Conference Publ. 145, pp 125–131 Palmerston North, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  28. Wear JI and Wilson CM (1954) Boron materials of low solubility and their use for plant growth. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc. 18: 425–428Google Scholar
  29. Whelan BR and Barrow NJ (1994) Slow-release selenium fertilizers to correct selenium deficiency in grazing sheep. Fert Res (In press)Google Scholar
  30. Winsor HW (1950) Boron sources of moderate solubility as supplements for sandy soils. Soil Sci 69: 321–332Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. J. Mortvedt
    • 1
  1. 1.National Fertilizer and Environmental Research CenterTennessee Valley AuthorityMuscle ShoalsUSA

Personalised recommendations