Computer Supported Cooperative Work

, Volume 2, Issue 1–2, pp 21–39 | Cite as

Working relations of technology production and use

  • Lucy Suchman


This paper explores the relevance of recent feminist reconstructions of objectivity for the development of alternative visions of technology production and use. I take as my starting place the working relations that make up the design and use of technical systems. Working relations are understood as networks or webs of connections that sustain the visible and invisible work required to construct coherent technologies and put them into use. I outline the boundaries that characterize current relations of development and use, and the boundary crossings required to transform them. Three contrasting premises for design-the view from nowhere, detached engagement, and located accountability — are taken to represent incommensurate alternatives for a politics of professional design. From the position of located accountability, I close by sketching aspects of what a feminist politics and associated practices of system development could be.

Key words

Design Practice Feminist Epistemology Social Boundaries Systems Development Work-oriented Design 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anzaldua, Gloria (1987):Borderlands/La Frontera The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bijker, Wiebe, Hughes Thomas, and Pinch, Trevor, eds. (1987):The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bjerknes G, Bratteteig, T., and Espeseth, T. (1991): Evolution of Finished Computer Systems: The dilemma of enhancement.Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems vol. 3, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar
  4. Blomberg, Jeanette, Giacomi, Jean, Mosher, Andrea and Swenton-Wall, Pat. (1993): Ethnographic Field Methods and their Relation to Design. InParticipatory Design: Principles and Practices, eds. D. Schuler and A. Namioka, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, pp. 123–156.Google Scholar
  5. Blomberg, Jeanette, Suchman, Lucy and Trigg, Randy (Forth.) Reflections on the Work-Oriented Design Project in Three Voices. InSocial Science, Research, Technical Systems and Cooperative Work, eds. G. Bowker, L. Gasser, S.L. Star, B. Turner. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
  6. Callon, Michel (1986): Some elements of a sociology of translation. In:Power, Action and Belief, ed. John Law London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196–233.Google Scholar
  7. Clement, Andrew (1991). Designing Without Designers: More Hidden Skill in Office Computerization? InWomen, Work and Computerization, eds. I. Eriksson, B. Kitchenham, and K. Tijdens. North Holland/Elsevier, pp. 15–32.Google Scholar
  8. Cockburn, Cynthia (1993): The Gender/Technology Relation: Taking Shape. Paper presented at the Conference onSex/Gender in Techno-Science Worlds, University of Melbourne, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins, H. M. (1985):Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Flax, Jane (1990): Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory, inFeminism/Posmodernism ed. Linda Nicholson, 39–62. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Floyd, C., Mehl, W.-M., Reisen, F-M, Schmidt, G., and Wolf, G. (1989): Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development.Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 253–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujimura, Joan (1987): Constructing ‘Do-able’ Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment.Social Studies of Science vol. 17, pp. 257–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenbaum, Joan, and Kyng, Morten (1991):Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  14. Grudin, Jonathan (1993): Obstacles to participatory design in large product development organizations InParticipatory design: Principles and practices, eds., D. Schuler and A. Namioka, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 99–119.Google Scholar
  15. Hales, Mike (1993): Where are Designers? Styles of design practice, objects of design and views of users in computer-supported cooperative work. InDesign Issues in CSCW, eds. D. Rosenberg and C. Hutchison. Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Haraway, Donna (1991): Situated Knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Chapter 9 inSimians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York, Routledge, pp. 183–201.Google Scholar
  17. Hekman, Susan (1990):Knowledge and Gender: Elements of a postmodern Feminism. Boston: Northeastem University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Knorr-Cetina, Karin and Michael Mulkay, eds. (1983):Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Knorr, Karin, Krohn, Roger, and Whitley, Richard eds.) (1981):The Social Process of Scientific Investigation. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  20. Kubler, George (1962).The Shape of Time, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kunda, Gideon (1992).Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Levy, David (1993). Document Reuse and Document Systems Technical Report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coyote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA U.S.A.Google Scholar
  23. Lynch, Michael (1993):Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lynch, Michael and Woolgar, Steve, eds. (1990):Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Newman, Susan (in prep)Hiding Heterogeneity and Manifesting Modularity: A Study of Representational Practices in Systems Design, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Education/Math, Science and Technology Division, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  26. Nicholson, Linda, J. (1990):Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Prins, Baukje (1993): The Ethics of Hybrid Subjects: Feminist Constructivism according to Donna Haraway. Paper for the EASST/PICT workshop onFeminism, Constructivism and Utility., Brunel, University of West London, UK.Google Scholar
  28. Schmidt, Kjeld and Bannon, Liam (1992): Taking CSCW, Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work.Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), vol. 1, nos. 1–2, pp. 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schuler, Douglas and Namioka, Aki (1993).Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Shapin, Steve (1989): The Invisible Technician.American Scientist, 77, pp. 554–563.Google Scholar
  31. Star, Susan Leigh (1989).Regions of the Mind: Brain Research and the Quest for Scientific Certainty. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Star, Susan Leigh (1991): Invisible Work and Silenced Dialogues in Knowledge Representation. InWomen, Work and Computerization, eds. I. Eriksson, B. Kitchenham and K. Tijdens K. Amsterdam: North Holland pp. 81–92.Google Scholar
  33. Star, Susan Leigh and James Griesemer (1989): Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology 1907–39.Social Studies of Science, vol. 19, pp. 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Suchman, Lucy and Brigitte Jordan (1989): Computerization and Women's Knowledge. In:Women, Work and Computerization, eds. K. Tijdens, M. Jennings, I. Wagner and M. Weggelaar, 153–160. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  35. Verran, Helen (1993): Including othered voices in knowledge production: Mixing epistemologies and ontologies. Paper presented at theConference on Sex/Gender in Techno-Science Worlds, University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  36. Wagner, Ina. in press. Connecting Communities of Practice: Feminism, Science and Technology.Women's Studies International Forum.Google Scholar
  37. Wajcman, Judy (1991):Feminism Confronts Technology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucy Suchman
    • 1
  1. 1.Xerox Palo Alto Research CenterPalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations