Skip to main content
Log in

SCF Xα DW nuclear magnetic screening tensor calculations

  • Published:
Journal of Structural Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Calculations have been performed on the nuclear magnetic screening tensors for molecules via perturbation theory and the Xα DW method, and a comparison is made with results from other methods. Although the absolute errors in the σμυ for the molecules are appreciable, the relative errors in determining the NR chemical shifts are much less (see for example, the shift for CO relative to CH4), which is a hopeful factor leading one to expect that Xα DW can be widely used in analyzing NMR spectra. At the same time, Xα DW can closely reproduces the σμυ anisotropy, which is particularly important for compounds such as V2O5 or its derivatives, which show very large anisotropy in the magnetic screening tensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. E. C. Vauthier, S. Odiot, and F. Tonnard, Can. J. Chem.,60, 957 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. C. Vauthier, S. Fliszar, F. Tonnard, and S. Odiot, Can. J. Chem.,61, 1417 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Cheremisin and P. V. Schastnev, J. Magn. Res.,40, 459 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Schindler and W. Kutzelnigg, Mol. Phys.,48, 781 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Schindler and W. Kutzelnigg, J. Chem. Phys.,76, 1919 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. A. Case and M. Karplus, Chem. Phys. Lett.,39, 33 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Larsson, M. Hehenberger, and P. de Mello Corrêa, Int. J. Quant. Chem.,18, 1271 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. J. M. Geurts, P. C. P. Bouten, and A. van der Avoird, J. Chem. Phys.,73, 1306 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Guenzburger and D. E. Ellis, Phys. Rev.B22, 4203 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Guenzburger and E. M. Baggio Saitovitch, Phys. Rev.B24, 2368 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Bieger, G. Seifert, H. Eschrig, and G. Grossmann, Chem. Phys. Lett.,115, 275 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. L. Beveridge, Semiempiral Methods of Electronic Structure Calculation, Part B, Applications, G. A. Segal (ed.), Plenum Press, New York (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. J. Baerends, D. E. Ellis, and P. Ros, Chem. Phys.,2, 41 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. J. Baerends and P. Ros, Chem. Phys.,2, 52 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. J. Baerends and P. Ros, Chem. Phys.,8, 412 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. B. Chesnut and C. K. Foley, J. Chem. Phys.,84, 852 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. M. Stevens and W. N. Lipscomb, J. Chem. Phys.,41, 184 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. V. Schastnev and A. A. Cheremisin, Zh. Strukt. Khim.,23, No. 3, 139 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  19. O. V. Gritsenko, A. A. Bagatur'yants, and G. M. Zhidomirov, Zh. Strukt. Khim.,21, No. 3, 22 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Catalysis Institute, Siberian Branch, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Translated from Zhurnal Strukturnoi Khimii, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 32–36, September–October, 1988.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Malkin, V.G., Zhidomirov, G.M. SCF Xα DW nuclear magnetic screening tensor calculations. J Struct Chem 29, 684–687 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00748140

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00748140

Keywords

Navigation