Conclusions
On the whole, the results of the work reported here demonstrate the adequacy of the wave functions of the INDO method for use in calculating the g-tensor in transition-metal complexes. Along with this, they show that certain elements of the calculational scheme previously proposed for analogous purposes in radicals [1] do require modification. For example, it is necessary in certain cases to account for configuration interaction (CI). In addition to the cases already mentioned in this article in which Eq. (1) is inapplicable because of neglect of CI, let us note that an accounting for CI is necessary in principle in systems with S> 1/2. Also, corrections to the g-factors in transition-metal complexes may be so large in some cases that it becomes necessary to diagonalize the matrix of the Hamiltonian, including spin and nonspin interactions. In the most natural form, the two modifications are combined when they are introduced simultaneously.
We have repeated many of the calculations using the system of parameters of [11], and have also repeated calculations within the framework of the CNDO method. In all cases, in the calculation of the g-tensor, the INDO method in the original parametrization [2] proved to be preferable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
G. M. Zhidomirov, T. V. Schastnev, and N. D. Chuvylkin, Quantum-Chemical Calculations of Magnetic Resonance Parameters [in Russian], Nauka, Novosibirsk (1978).
D. W. Clack, Mol. Phys.,27, 1513 (1974).
H. P. Figeys, P. Geerlings, and C. Van Alsenoy, Int. J Quantum Chem.,11, 705 (1977).
K. I. Zamaraev, Author's Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation, Institute of Chemical Physics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow (1972).
A. J. Stone, Proc. R. Soc. London,271, 424 (1963).
B. N. Plakhutin and G. M. Zhidomirov, Summaries of Papers from 5th All-Union Conference on the Application of Computers in Spectroscopy [in Russian], Novosibirsk (1980), p. 113.
Z. A. Starikova and E. A. Shugam, Zh. Strukt. Khim.,10, 290 (1969).
I. Robertson and M. T. Truter, J. Chem. Soc. A, p. 309 (1967).
D. Hall, A. J. McKinnon, T. N. Waters, J. Chem. Soc., p. 425 (1965).
D. H. Maki and B. R. McGarvey, J. Chem. Fiz.,29, 31 (1958).
H. B. Shokhirev and P. V. Schastnev, Zh. Strukt. Khim.,19, 211 (1978).
V. V. Minin, Yu. V. Rakitin, V. V. Volkov, and G. M. Larin, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim.,10, 2205 (1980).
I. Bertini et al., Inorg. Chem.,19, 2198 (1980).
T. S. Piper and R. L. Belford, Mol. Phys.,5, 169 (1962).
C. Dijkgraaf, Theor. Chim. Acta,3, 38, (1965).
F. A. Cotton and J. J. Wise, Inorg. Chem.,6, 917 (1967).
J. Von Neumann and E. P. Wigner, in: Symmetry in the Solid State [Russian translation], Nauka, Moscow (1970), p. 153.
A. A. Shklyaev and V. F. Anufrienko, Zh. Strukt. Khim.,16, 1082 (1975).
Additional information
Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch, Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Translated from Zhurnal Strukturnoi Khimii, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 3–11, March–April, 1983.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plakhutin, B.I., Zhidomirov, G.M. & Zamaraev, K.I. Indo calculations of spin-hamiltonian constants in transition-metal complexes. Influence of structural distortions and adduct formation on g-tensor of copper (II) bis-acetylacetonate. J Struct Chem 24, 169–176 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00747373
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00747373