Journal of Structural Chemistry

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 942–948 | Cite as

P31 nuclear magnetic relaxation, self-diffusion, and viscosity of tri-n-butylphosphate solutions in inert solvents

  • A. A. Vashman
  • I. S. Pronin
Article

Conclusions

The joint investigation of spin—lattice relaxation, self-diffusion, and viscosity makes it possible to come to some qualitative conclusions concerning the usefulness of the explicit expressions for correlation times in depicting the concentration dependences of time T1 in two-component mixtures of liquids. Parameter (T1ν)−1 varies nonlinearly with concentration for chemically noninteracting liquids. However, this cannot serve as an indication of the formation of associations in the solution since possible small conformational changes in the molecule containing the relaxing nuclei will affect the intramolecular contribution to the relaxation because of the strong dependence of this contribution on the effective distance between the dipole-interacting nuclei in complex molecules.

The dependence of the conformation of the TBP molecule on the type and concentration of the solvent could also be a cause affecting the reactivity of the extractant and the variation in the distribution coefficients during the extraction of metals with tributyl phosphate solutions.

The authors thank T. Ya. Vereshchagina for preparing the solutions and V. E. Samsonov for helping with the measurements.

Keywords

Distribution Coefficient Correlation Time Joint Investigation Complex Molecule Lattice Relaxation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Symposium: Extraction [in Russian], No. 1, Atomizdat, Moscow (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Blombergen, E. M. Purcell, and R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev.,73, 679 (1948).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Kubo and K. Tomita, J. Phys. Soc. Japan,9, 888 (1954).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. W. Mitchell and M. Eisner, J. Chem. Phys.,33, 86 (1960);34, 651 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. M. Pritchard and R. E. Richards, Trans. Faraday Soc.,62, 1388 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Debye, Polar Molecules [Russian translation], GTII, Moscow (1937).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Gierer and K. Wirtz, Z. Naturforsch.,8a, 532 (1953).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N. E. Hill, Proc. Phys. Soc.,67B, 149 (1954).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. F. Bezrukov and M. F. Vuks, Ukr. Fiz. Zh.,12, 160 (1967).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Z. Pajak, J. Angerer, and N. Pislewski, Magnetic Resonance and Relaxation, Amsterdam (1967), p. 123.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. N. Bhar, Nuovo Cimento,40B, No. 2, 416 (1965).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    O. D. Vetrov, Doctoral Dissertation, Institute of Chemical Physics, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow (1969).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    I. S. Pronin and A. A. Vashman, Zh. Strukt. Khim.,11, 1115 (1970).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. H. Stokes, Trans. Faraday Soc.,49, 886 (1953).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. E. Hill, Proc. Phys. Soc.,68B, 209 (1955).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Houghton, J. Chem. Phys.,40, 1628 (1964).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. A. Valiev and M. I. Emel'yanov, Zh. Strukt. Khim., 5, 7 (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau, a division of Plenum Publishing Corporation 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Vashman
  • I. S. Pronin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations