Advertisement

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 89–95 | Cite as

Cytogenetic analysis of plants regenerated from colchicine-treated callus cultures of an interspecificHordeum hybrid

  • T. J. Orton
  • R. P. Steidl
Article

Summary

Hybrids ofHordeum vulgare (HV) xH. jubatum (HJ) were synthesized for purposes of introgressive breeding, but were sterile and the recovery of pure diploid tillers by colchicine applications in vivo was difficult. Plant regeneration from colchicine-treated callus cultures of the hybrid (HV x HJ) was investigated as a means to produce high numbers of pure diploid, fertile intermediates. 10 of 50 plants regenerated in this manner exhibited variable chromosome numbers with means of approximately 37 (expected diploid number = 42). Cytological examinations of microsporogenesis in all such plants revealed a high incidence of bivalent formation at metaphase I (as compared to nearly complete asynapsis in the F1), but spindle and chromosome abnormalities in later meiotic stages led to complete sterility. Approximately 40% of HJ plants regenerated from colchicine-treated calli appeared to be pure tetraploids of high fertility. These techniques are hence useful for high frequency production of diploid or polyploid plants.

Key words

Cytogenetics Plant regeneration Introgressive breeding Callus culture Regenerates Barley Hordeum hybrids 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Caldwell, R.M.; Schafer, J.F.; Compton, L.E.; & Patterson, F.L. (1965): Resistance to leaf rust derived fromAgropyron elongatum. Int. Wheat Rust Conf.3, 95–96Google Scholar
  2. D'Amato, F. (1977): Cytogenetics of differentiation in tissue and cell cultures. In: Plant cell, tissue, and organ culture (eds.: Reinert, J.; Bajaj, Y.P.S.), pp. 343–357. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  3. Darlington, CD.; Thomas, P.T. (1937): The breakdown of cell division in aFestuca-Lolium derivative. Ann. Bot.1, 747–761Google Scholar
  4. Galinat, W.C. (1977): The origin of corn. In: Corn and corn improvement. (ed. Sprague, G.F.), pp. 1–48. Madison, Wis. Amer. Soc. Agron.Google Scholar
  5. Gamborg, O.L.; Miller, R.A.; Qjima, K. (1968): Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exper. Cell Res.50, 148–151Google Scholar
  6. Kasha, K.J. (1975): Haploids from somatic cells. In: Haploids in higher plants, advances and potential. (ed.; Kasha, K.J.), pp. 67–90. Guelph, Ont. (Canada): University of GuelphGoogle Scholar
  7. Knott, D.R. (1961): The inheritance of rust resistance 6: The transfer of stem rust resistance fromAgropyron elongatum to common wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci.41, 109–123Google Scholar
  8. Knott, D.R.; Dvorak, J.; Nanda, J.S. (1977): The transfer to wheat and homoeology of anAgropyron elongatum chromosome carrying resistance to stem rust. Can. J. Genet. Cytol.19, 75–79Google Scholar
  9. Larson, R.I.; Atkinson, T.G. (1973): Wheat-Agropyron chromosome substitution lines as sources of resistance to wheat streak mosaic virus and its vector,Aceria tulipae. Proc. Int. Wheat Genet. Symp.4, 200–214Google Scholar
  10. Linsmaier, E.M.; Skoog, F. (1965): Organic growth requirement of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant.18, 100–127Google Scholar
  11. Murashige, T.; Nakano, R. (1966): Tissue culture as a potential tool in obtaining polyploid plants. J. Hered.57, 115–118Google Scholar
  12. Murry, L.E. (1975): A cytogenetic investigation of xAgrohordeum pilosilemma. E. Lansing, Mich.: Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Orton, T.J. (1979): A quantitative analysis of growth and regeneration from tissue cultures ofHordeum vulgare, H. jubatum, and their interspecific hybrid. Environm. Exper. Bot. (in press)Google Scholar
  14. Orton, T.J. (1980): Chromosomal variability in tissue cultures and regenerated plants ofHordeum. Theor. Appl. Genet.56,Google Scholar
  15. Rajathy, T.; Morrison, J.W. (1959): Cytogenetic studies in the genusHordeum 4: Hybrids ofH. jubatum, H. brachyantherum, H. vulgare, and a hexaploidHordeum sp. Can. J. Genet. Cytol.1, 124–132Google Scholar
  16. Rick, C.M. (1973): Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observations in native habitats. In: Genes, enzymes and populations. (ed.: Srb, A.M.), pp. 235–269. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Sears, E.R. (1956): The transfer of leaf-rust resistance fromAegilops umbellulata to wheat. Brookhaven Symp. Biol.9, 1–22Google Scholar
  18. Sears, E.R. (1972): Chromosome engineering in wheat. Stadler Symp.4, 23–38Google Scholar
  19. Smith, H.H. (1971): Broadening the base of genetic variability in plants. J. Hered.62, 265–276Google Scholar
  20. Starks, G.D.; Tai, W. (1974): Genome analysis ofHordeum jubatum andH. compressum. Can. J. Genet. Cytol.16, 663–668Google Scholar
  21. Steidl, R.P. (1976): The hybridizations of barley (Hordeum vulgare L. Emend Lam.) with its wild relatives. E. Lansing, Mich.: Ph.D. Thesis, Michigan State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Sunderland, N. (1977): Nuclear cytology. In Plant cell and tissue culture. Vol. 2, pp. 177–206. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Wagenaar, E.B. (1960): The cytology of three hybrids involvingHordeum jubatum L.: The chiasma distributions and the occurrence of pseudoring bivalents in genetically-induced asynapsis. Can. J. Bot.38, 69–85Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. J. Orton
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. P. Steidl
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil Sciences MichiganState UniversityEast LamingUSA
  2. 2.Department of Vegetable CropsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  3. 3.Cargill SeedsMonticelloUSA

Personalised recommendations