Skip to main content
Log in

Modulation of the chloroplast ATPase by tight ADP binding. Effect of uncouplers and ATP

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inactivation of the membrane-bound ATPase by tight ADP binding was studied under nonenergized conditions. The energy state of the system was controlled either by omitting MgCl2, preventing ATP hydrolysis, or by addition of an uncoupler which dissipates the\(\Delta \overline \mu _{{\rm H}^ + } \). In the absence of Mg2+, ATP prevents the inactivation of the enzyme by ADP, in a competitive manner. This effect of ATP resembles that of GDP with Mg2+ present. In the presence of nigericin, Mg2+, and ATP, inactivation occurs after a 10–15-sec interval, during which the enzyme is able to hydrolyze ATP at a relatively rapid rate. The degree of inactivation is proportional to the level of bound ADP detected. This behavior is different from that of the coupled ATPase (no uncoupler added), where inactivation is attained only upon exhaustion of the ATP by its hydrolysis, despite the finding that ADP binds tightly to the active ATPase at all stages of the reaction. Higher levels of tightly bound ADP were detected in the presence of an uncoupler. We suggest that the interval during which the enzyme becomes inactive is that required for the enzyme to generate and bind ADP, and to change from the active to the inactive conformation. These results support the mechanism suggested previously for the modulation of the ATPase by tight nucleotide binding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnon, D. I. (1949).Plant Physiol. 24 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker-Grunwald, T. (1974).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 368 386–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker-Grunwald, T., and Van Dam, K. (1973).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 292 808–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Zvi, D., and Shavit, N. (1980a).FEBS Lett. 119 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Zvi, D., and Shavit, N. (1980b).Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Photosynthesis (Akoyunoglou, G., ed.), Vol. 2, Balaban Int. Sci. Serv., Philadelphia, pp. 801–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Zvi, D., and Shavit, N. (1982).Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 681 451–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennun, A., and Avron, M. (1965).Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 109 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, C. (1969).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 189 256–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, C. (1970).FEBS Lett. 7 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, C., and Avron, M. (1967).Eur. J. Biochem. 2 318–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, C., and Lifshitz, Y. (1972).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 267 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, J. W., and McCarty, R. E. (1981).J. Biol. Chem. 256 8947–8956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham, K. R., and Selman, B. R. (1981).J. Biol. Chem. 256 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräber, P., Schlodder, E., and Witt, H. T. (1977).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 461 426–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. H., and Slater, E. C. (1975).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 387 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, Y., and Carmeli, C. (1981).Biochemistry 20 6287–6292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, O., and Ernster, L. (1956).Method. Biochem. Anal. 3 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, R. P., and McCarty, R. E. (1976).Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 70 1283–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rienits, K. G. (1967)Biochim. Biophys. Acta 143 595–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann, J., and Strotmann, H. (1980).Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Photosynthesis (Akoyunoglou, G. ed.), Vol. 2, Balaban Int. Sci. Serv., Philadelphia, pp. 881–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, N. (1980).Ann. Rev. Biochem. 49 111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, N., Aflalo, C., and Bar-Zvi, D. (1981). InEnergy Coupling in Photosynthesis (Selman, B. R., and Selman-Reimer, S., eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavit, N., and Strotmann, H. (1980).Methods Enzymol. 69 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoshan, V., Shahak, Y., and Shavit, N. (1980).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 591 423–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slooten, L., and Nuyten, A. (1981).Biochim. Biophys. Acta 633 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strotmann, H., Bickel, S., and Huchzermeyer, B. (1976).FEBS Lett. 61 194–198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bar-Zvi, D., Shavit, N. Modulation of the chloroplast ATPase by tight ADP binding. Effect of uncouplers and ATP. J Bioenerg Biomembr 14, 467–478 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00743072

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00743072

Key Words

Navigation