Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 359–368 | Cite as

Matrix strengthening in continuous fibre reinforced composites under monotonic and cyclic loading conditions

  • R. E. Lee
  • S. J. Harris


Unidirectional and cyclic tensile stress-strain testing has been carried out on continuous tungsten fibre reinforced copper composites, with fibre diameter from 11 to 48 Μm at a volume fraction of 0.37. In tensile tests the composites showed positive deviations from the rule of mixtures, the amount increasing with a decrease in fibre diameter and, therefore, interfibre spacing. This matrix strengthening continued to failure and was shown to be related in part to the matrix grain size.

In the cyclic stress-strain tests the matrix strengthening was approximately the same for all the composites and was greater than for the tensile tests. The strengthening could be accounted for by the formation of a substructure during cycling of approximately 0.5 Μm cell size.


Polymer Copper Grain Size Tungsten Tensile Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Jackson, D. M. Braddick andA. A. Baker,Fibre Sci. & Tech. 5 (1972) 219.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. A. Baker, D. M. Braddick andP. Jackson,J. Mater. Sci. 7 (1972) 747.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Kelly andH. Lilholt,Phil. Mag. 20 (1969) 311.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Garmong andL. A. Shepard,Met. Trans. 2 (1971) 175.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. F. Stuhrke, ASTM STP438 (1969) p. 108.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Neumann andP. Haasen,Phil. Mag. 23 (1971) 285.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    K. Tanaka andT. Mori,ibid 23 (1971) 737.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. F. Tavernelli andL. F. Coffin,Trans. ASM 51 (1959) 438.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. A. Baker,Appl. Mat. Res. 5 (1966) 143.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Kelly andM. J. Bomford, “Physics of Strength and Plasticity” (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1969) p. 339.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. A. Baker, A. Martin andR. J. Bache, “Composites”,2 (1971) 154.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. C. Grosskreutz, “Fatigue1 An Interdisciplinary Approach”, edited by J. J. Burke (Syracuse N.Y. University Press, 1964) p. 27.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. R. Hancock andJ. C. Grosskreutz, ASTM STP 438 (1969) p. 134.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. K. Chawla,Metallography 6 (1973) 155.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman and Hall 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. E. Lee
    • 1
  • S. J. Harris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy and Materials ScienceUniversity of NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations