Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 19, Issue 5, pp 521–530 | Cite as

Experimental analysis of absolute space-time Lorentz theories

  • A. K. A. Maciel
  • J. Tiomno
Article

Abstract

Experiments designed to test Special Relativity are reviewed and their capabilities of distinguishing Special Relativity from Absolute Space-Time theories is analyzed. Of two specific forms of Absolute theories proposed in recent years, we show that one is refuted by past experiments while the other is still in contention.

Keywords

Specific Form Experimental Analysis Past Experiment Special Relativity Lorentz Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. K. A. Maciel and J. Tiomno,Found. Phys., preceding paper.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. G. Torr and P. Kolen,Found. Phys. 12, 265 (1982); andFound. Phys. 12, 401 (1982).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. A. Rodrigues and J. Tiomno,Found. Phys. 15, 945 (1985); andRev. Bras. Fis. 14 (Suppl.), 450 (1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Tiomno,Proceedings Fourth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity, R. Ruffini, ed. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. K. A. Maciel and J. Tiomno,Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 143 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Sagnac,C.R. Acad. Sci. (Paris),157, 1410 (1913).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. F. Smoot, M. V. Gorenstein, and R. A. Muller,Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 898 (1977).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. Joos,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 7, 385 (1930).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. C. Champeney and P. B. Moon,Proc. Phys. Soc. London 77, 350 (1961); and D. C. Champeney, G. R. Isaak, and A. M. Khan,Phys. Lett. 7, 241 (1963).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. C. Turner and H. A. Hill,Phys. Rev. 134, B252 (1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. S. Jaseja, A. Javan, J. Murray, and C. H. Townes,Phys. Rev. 133, A1221 (1964).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Tiomno, “Possivies Violações da Teoria da Relatividade,”Rev. Bras. Fis., special issue in honor of Prof. M. Schemberg (1987), in press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Brillet and J. L. Hall,Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 549 (1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Given the experimental evidence against a distorted Lorentz boost as described in Sec. 2, we disregard here the β term of Eq. 3.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Spavieri and G. Contreras,Nuovo Cimento 91B, 143 (1986).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Spavieri,Found. Phys. Lett. 1, 373 (1988).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. K. A. Maciel and J. Tiomno,Found. Phys. Lett., to be submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. K. A. Maciel
    • 1
  • J. Tiomno
    • 1
  1. 1.Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas (CBPF/CNPq)Rio de Janeiro, RJBrasil

Personalised recommendations