Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 173–176 | Cite as

Breast asymmetry: an objective analysis of postoperative results

  • B. Stark
  • N. Olivari
Originals

Summary

Between 1983 and 1989, 72 patients with breast asymmetry were operated on; the average age at surgery was 24.7 years. The classification of Elsahay and Bohmert was used for preoperative planning. 37 patients presented a relative macromasty, 11 a relative micromasty, 10 a relative macro/micromasty. An asymmetrical macromasty was corrected in 10 and an asymmetrical micromasty in 4 patients. 56 patients were reviewed at a mean of 1.6 years after surgery. A unit system was developed in order to objectively measure the postoperative symmetry. The end result was graded on a 4-point scale. Excellent and good results were noted in 65.6% of the patients, while 34.4% were classified as fair or poor. 85% of the patients were satisfied with the operation.

Key words

Breast asymmetry Follow-up Complications Objective postoperative results 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berrino P, Galli A, Rainero ML, Santi P (1988) Unilateral reduction mammaplasty: sculpturing the breast from the under-surface. Plast Reconstr Surg 82:88–98Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Capozzi A (1986) Clinical experience with Heyer-Schulte inflatable implants in breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 77:772–778Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Doerr W, Seifert G, Uehlinger E, Bassler R (1978) Spezielle pathologische Anatomic. Bd 11.6, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elliott MP (1988) A musculocutaneous transposition flap mammaplasty for correction of the tuberous breast. Ann Plast Surg 20:153–157Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elliott RA, Hoehn JG, Greminger RF (1975) Correction of asymmetrical breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 56:260–265Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elsahay NJ (1976) Correction of asymmetries of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 57:700–703Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herndl E, Mallinckrodt G v, Spiker G, Schmeer A (1984) Langzeitergebnisse nach Mammaaugmentationen. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 16:118–121Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffman S (1986) Recurrent deformities following reduction mammaplasty and correction of breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:55–60Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pierre ML, Jouglard J-P (1975) Treatment of unilateral hypoplasia or absence of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 56:146–151Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Planas J Mosely LH (1980) Improving breast shape and symmetry in reduction mammaplasty. Ann Plast Surg 4:297–303Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shulman Y, Westreich M (1981) Treatment of mild breast asymmetry. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:31–33Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vandenbussche F (1984) Asymmetries of the breast: a classification system. Aesthetic Plast Surg 8:27–36Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williams G, Hoffman S (1981) Mammaplasty for tubular breasts. Aesthetic Plast Surg 5:51–56Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Stark
    • 1
  • N. Olivari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryDreifaltigkeitskrankenhausWesselingFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations