Abstract
Fuller's program of social epistemology engages a rhetoric of inquiry that can be usefully compared and contrasted with other discursive theories of knowledge, such as that of Richard Rorty. Resisting the model of “conversation,” Fuller strikes an activist posture and lays the groundwork for normative “knowledge policy,” in which persuasion and credibility play key roles. The image of investigation is one that overtly rejects the “storehouse” conception of knowledge and invokes the metaphors of distributive economics. Productive questions arise as to how notions of creation and distribution might guide this rhetoric.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eco, U.: 1984,Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN.
Fuller, S.: 1988,Social Epistemology, Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN.
Giddens, A.: 1979,Central Problems in Social Theory, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Lyne, J.: 1990, ‘The Culture of Inquiry’,Quarterly Journal of Speech 76, 192–224.
MacIntyre, A.: 1988,Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN.
Nelson, J., A. Megill, and D. McCloskey: 1987,The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI.
Rorty, R.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Rorty, R.: 1989,Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
Willard, C.: 1989,A Theory of Argumentation, University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lyne, J. Social epistemology as a rhetoric of inquiry. Argumentation 8, 111–124 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733364
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733364