Abstract
The objective of this article is to provide a formalism to deal with the special theory of relativity (STR, in short) as riewed by Reichenbach, according to which STR involves an ineradicableconventionality of simultaneity. One of the two postulates of STR asserts that, in empty space, the one-way speed of light relative to inertial frames is constant. Experimental evidence, however, is related to the constancy of the round-trip speed of light and has no bearing on one-way speeds. Following Reichenbach's viewpoint, we relax the second postulate of STR, abandoning the constancy of the one-way speed of light to the more realistic one asserting the constancy of the round-trip speed of light. This, in turn, results in a formalism to deal with Reichenbach's special theory of relativity (RSTR, in short) in which the two one-way speeds of light in empty space, C±, in the two senses of a round-trip are arbitrarily selected in such a way that their harmonic mean is the measurable round-trip speed of light, c. Experimentally, RSTR and STR are indistinguishable and, hence, represent the same physical theory. It is only the formalism that we use to deal with STR which is extended in RSTR to accommodate the immeasurability of one-way velocities. The usefulness of the proposed formalism to study special relativity is demonstrated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References and notes
A. P. French,Special Relativity (Norton, New York, 1968), p. 51.
See, for instance, A. S. Eddington,The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, 2nd edn. (Cambridge, The University Press, 1924); H. P. Robertson, “Postulate versus observation in the special theory of relativity,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 378–382 (1949); Builder and Edwards.(27)
A. Einstein, “Zur Elektrodynamik Bewegter Körper (On the electrodynamics of moving bodies),”Ann. Physik 17, 891–921 (1905). For English translation, see H. M. Schwartz,Am. J. Phys. 45, 18 (1977); and H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl,The Principle of Relativity, trans. by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffery (Dover, New York, 1952), pp. 37–65.
H. Reichenbach,Axiomatization of the Theory of Relativity, trans. and ed. by M. Reichenbach, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1969).
A. Grünbaum, “Simultaneity by slow clock transport in the special theory of relativity,”Philos. Sci. 46, 5–43 (1969).
M. Friedman,Foundations of Space-Time theories, Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983).
A. Ungar, “Ether and the one-way speed of light,”Am. J. Phys. 56, 814 (1988).
Several relevant articles by Ives are reproduced in D. Turner and R. Hazelett,The Einstein Myth and the Ives Papers (Devin Adair, Old Greenwich, Connecticut, 1979).
Thomas E. Phipps, “Getting wind of the ether,”Phys. Essays, preprint.
R. Weingard, “Remark on The special theory of relativity and the one-way speed of light,”Am. J. Phys. 53, 492 (1985).
J. Norton, “The quest for the one way velocity of light,”Br. J. Philos. Sci. 37, 118–119 (1986).
L. Karlov, “Clocks in nonstandard synchrony,”Gen. Relativ Gravit 19, 455–464 (1987).
R. K. Clifton, “Some recent controversy over the possibility of experimentally determining isotropy in the speed of light,”Philos. Sci. 56, 688–696 (1989).
R. W. Brehme, “Response to The conventionality of synchronization,”Am. J. Phys. 53, 56–59 (1985); and “On the physical reality of the isotropic speed of light,”Am. J. Phys. 56, 811–813 (1988).
R. de Ritis and S. Guccione, “Can Einstein's definition of simultaneity be considered a convention?”Gen. Relativ Gravit 17, 595–598 (1985).
G. Spavieri, “Nonequivalence of ether theories and special relativity,”Phys. Rev. A 34, 1708–1713 (1986).
G. Stolakis, “Against conventionalism in physics,”Br. J. Philos. Sci. 37, 229–232 (1986).
E. Riis, L. A. Andersen, N. Bjerre, O. Poulsen, S. A. Lee, and J. L. Hall, “Test of the isotropy of the speed of light using fast-beam laser spectroscopy,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 81–84 (1988).
W. F. Edwards, “Special relativity in anisotropic space,”Am. J. Phys. 31, 482–489 (1963).
J. A. Winnie, “Special relativity without one-way velocity assumptions: Parts I and II,”Philos. Sci. 37, 81–99, 223–238 (1970); and H. R. Brown, “Discussion: Does the principle of relativity imply Winnie's (1970) equal passage times principle?”Philos. Sci. 57, 313–324 (1990).
A. Ungar, “The Lorentz transformation group of the special theory of relativity without Einstein's isotropy convention,”Philos. Sci. 53, 395–402 (1986).
See H. E. Wilhelm, “Lorentz transformation as a Galilei transformation with physical length and time contractions,”Z. Naturforsch. 43a, 859–864 (1988).
J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics (Wiley, New York, 1975), 2nd edn., p. 506.
A. Einstein,Relativity, The Special and General Theory (a popular exposition), trans. by R. W. Lawson (Crown Publishers, New York, 1961).
p. 17 of Ref. 24.
p. 23 of Ref. 24.
See, for instance, G. Builder, “The constancy of the velocity of light,”Aust. J. Phys. 11, 457–480 (1958); and W. F. Edwards, “Special relativity in anisotropic space,”Am. J. Phys. 31, 482–489 (1963).
R. Torretti,Relativity and Geometry (Pergamon Press, New York, 1983), Ch. 7.
V. G. Boltyanskii, “An anisotropic theory of relativity and optimization,”Diff. Eq. 15, 1371–1376 (1979).
D. Malament, “Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaneity,”Noûs 11, 293–300 (1977).
B. Townsend, “The special theory of relativity and the one-way speed of light,”Am. J. Phys. 51, 1092–1096 (1983).
See, for instance, G. Arfken,Mathematical Methods for Physicists (Academic Press, New York, 1985), 3rd ed., pp. 206–209.
See Torretti, (28) Ch. 7 p. 79 and p. 298 n. 5.
A citation from G. Stephenson and C. W. Kilmister,Special Relativity for Physicists (Longmans, New York, 1958), p. 20.
L. C. Baired, “Linearity of the Lorentz transformation,”Am. J. Phys. 44, 167–171 (1976).
V. Berzi and V. Gorini, “Reciprocity principle and the Lorentz transformations,”J. Math. Phys. 10, 1518–1524 (1969).
A. R. Lee and T. M. Kalotas, “Lorentz transformations from first postulate,”Am. J. Phys. 43, 434–437 (1975).
J. M. Lévy-Leblond, “One more derivation of the Lorentz transformation,”Am. J. Phys. 44, 271–277 (1976); J. M. Lévy-Leblond, “Additivity, rapidity, relativity,”Am. J. Phys. 47, 1045–1049 (1979). For a comment on the derivation of the Lorentz transformation by Lévy-Leblond, see A. W. Ross.(39)
A. W. Ross, “Note on the derivation of the Lorentz transformation by Lévy-Leblond,”Am. J. Phys. 55, 174–175 (1987).
A. M. Srivastava, “Invariant speed in special relativity,”Am. J. Phys. 49, 504–505 (1981).
G. E. Martin,Transformation Geometry: An Introduction to Symmetry (Springer, New York, 1982), p. 30.
H. Weyl,Philosophy of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1949), p. 13.
See, for inistance, K. W. Ford,Classical and Modern Physics, Vol. 3 (Xerox College Publ., Toronto, 1974).
R. W. Brehme, “The advantage of teaching relativity with four-vector,”Am. J. Phys. 36, 896–901 (1968).
C. G. Adler, “Does mass really depend on velocity, Dad?”Am. J. Phys. 55, 739–743 (1987).
L. Tsai, “The relation between gravitational mass, inertial mass, and velocity,”Am. J. Phys. 54, 340–342 (1986); N. Gauthier, “Equality of gravitational and inertial mass in special relativity,”Am. J. Phys. 54, 873 (1986).
See, for instance, J. H. Smith,Introduction to Special Relativity (Benjamin, New York, 1965), pp. 106–108.
S. F. Fung and K. C. Hsieh, “Is the isotropy of light a convention?”Am. J. Phys. 48, 654–657 (1980).
C. Nissim-Sabat, “Can one measure the one-way velocity of light?,”Am. J. Phys. 50, 533–567 (1982).
B. Ellis and P. Bowman, “Conventionality in distant simultaneity,”Philos. Sci. 34, 116–136 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ungar, A.A. Formalism to deal with Reichenbach's special theory of relativity. Found Phys 21, 691–726 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733277
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733277