“Special” states in quantum measurement apparatus: Structural requirements for the recovery of standard probabilities
- 49 Downloads
In a recently proposed quantum measurement theory the definiteness of quantum measurements is achieved by means of “special” states. The recovery of the usual quantum probabilities is related to the relative abundance of particular classes of “special” states. In the present article we consider two-state discrimination, and model the apparatus modes that could provide the “special” states. We find that there are structural features which, if generally present in apparatus, will provide universal recovery of standard probabilities. These structural features relate to the distribution of certain Hamiltonian matrix elements or interaction times. In particular, those quantities must be asymptotically (x → ∞) distributed according to the Cauchy law, Ca(x)=a/π(x 2 +a 2 ).
KeywordsMatrix Element Structural Feature Relative Abundance Present Article Interaction Time
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.L. S. Schulman,J. Stat. Phys. 42, 689 (1986);Phys. Lett. A 102, 396 (1984);Phys. Lett. A 130, 194 (1988);Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 183, 320 (1988);Found. Phys. Lett. 2, 515 (1989); inPath Integrals from meV to MeV, V. Sa-Yakanitet al., eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), p. 35.Google Scholar
- 2.B. Gaveau and L. S. Schulman,J. Stat. Phys. 58, 1209 (1990).Google Scholar
- 3.L. S. Schulman, C. R. Doering, and B. Gaveau, “Quantum decay in multi-level systems,”J. Phys. A 24, 2053 (1991).Google Scholar
- 4.L. S. Schulman, “Definite quantum measurements,”Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), to appear (1991).Google Scholar
- 5.M. Born, “Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge,”Z. Phys. 37, 863 (1926); translation printed in J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek,Quantum Theory and Measurement (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1983).Google Scholar
- 6.M. F. Shlesinger,Physica D 38, 304 (1989); B. D. Hughes, E. W. Montroll, and M. F. Shlesinger,J. Stat. Phys. 28, 111 (1982); E. W. Montroll and B. J. West, inFluctuation Phenomena, E. W. Montroll and J. L. Lebowitz, eds., 2nd edn. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1987).Google Scholar
- 7.W. Feller,An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Vol. II (Wiley, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
- 8.E. P. Wigner,Z. Phys. 131, 101 (1952); H. Araki and M. Yanase,Phys. Rev. 120, 622 (1960); M. Yanase,Phys. Rev. 123, 666 (1961).Google Scholar
- 9.T. L. Bell, U. Frisch, and H. Frisch,Phys. Rev. A 17, 1049 (1978).Google Scholar
- 10.J. E. Avron, G. Roepstorff, and L. S. Schulman, “Ground state degeneracy and ferromagnetism in a spin glass,”J. Stat. Phys. 26, 25 (1981).Google Scholar
- 11.H. Scher, M. F. Shlesinger, and J. T. Bendler, “Time-scale invariance in transport and relaxation,”Phys. Today 44(1), 26 (1991).Google Scholar