Abstract
In the face of widespread cynicism as regards the possibilities for reasoned and reasonable adjudication of ethical differences in the postmodern age, this essay proposes a dialogic, reconstructive rhetoric as a vehicle for jointly arguing about the ethics of past actions, and looks to the friendship circle as a model arena for the playing out of such a rhetoric. Analyzed by way of illustration is a conversation among four good friends about the ethics of another, surreptitiously taped, conversation between two of those friends.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apel, K. O.: 1980,Toward a Transformation of Philosophy, trans. Adey and Frisby, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Aristotle: 1909,Rhetoric., Trans. C. Jebb, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bennet, W. L.: 1978, ‘Storytelling in Criminal Trials: A Model of Social Judgment,.’Quarterly Journal of Speech, 64, 1–22.
Billig, M.: 1987,Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buber, M.: 1958,I and Thou, New York: Scribners & Sons.
Burke, K.: 1938; 2nd ed. rev. 1959.Attitudes Toward History, Los Altos, Ca.: Hermes Publications.
Burke, K.: 1969,A Grammar of Motives, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Crapanzanao, V.: 1990, On Dialogue, in T. Maranhão, (ed.),The Interpretation of Dialogue, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Deutsch, M.: 1969, ‘Conflicts: Productive and Destructive,’Journal of Social Issues,25, 7–41.
Fletcher, J.: 1966,Situation Ethics: The New Morality, Philadelphia: Westminister Press.
Gadamer, H. G.: 1975,Truth and Method., trans. Barden and Cummings, New York: Seabury Press.
Gergen, K. J.: 1991,The Saturated Self, New York: The Free Press.
Goffman, E.: 1959,The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor.
Goffman, E.: 1969,Strategic Interaction, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Habermas, J.: 1979,Communication and the Evolution of Society, trans. T. McCarthy, Boston: Beacon Press.
Haley, J.: 1976,Problem-Solving Therapy, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jönsen, A.E. and Toulmin, S.: 1988,The Abuse of Casuistry, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kontopoulos, K.: 1993, ‘The Dark Side of Fire: Postmodern Critique and the Elusiveness of the Ideological,’Argumentation (forthcoming).
Lyotard, J.: 1984,The Postmodern Condition: A report on Knowledge, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
MacIntyre, A.: 1981,After Virtue, Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Maranhão, T.: 1990, ‘Introduction,’ in T. Maranhão, (ed.),The Interpretation of Dialogue, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Margolis, J.: 1990, ‘Reconciling Realism and Relativism,’ in H. W. Simons, (ed.),The Rhetorical Turn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McKeon, R.: 1990, ‘Dialogue and Controversy in Philosophy,’ in T. Maranhão, (ed.),The Interpretation of Dialogue, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Megill, A.: 1989, ‘What Does the Term ‘Postmodern’ Mean?,Annals of Scholarship,6, 129–151.
Potter, J. & Wetherill, M.: 1987,Discourse and Social Psychology, London: Sage.
Rawlins, W. K.: 1983, Openness as Problematic in Ongoing Relationships. Two Conversational DilemmasCommunication Monographs. 50, 1–13.
Rorty, R.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Scott, M. B. & Lyman, S.: 1968 ‘Accounts,’American Sociological Review,33, 46–62.
Simons, H. W.: 1985, ‘Chronicle and Critique of a Conference;’Quarterly Journal of Speech,71, 52–64.
Simons, H. W.: 1990,The Rhetorical Turn, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Stevenson, C. L.: 1944,Ethics and Language, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Swearingen, C. J.: 1990, ‘The Logic of Dialetic and the Interpretation of Logic,’ in T. Maranhao, (ed.)The Interpretation of Dialogue, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Valesio, P.: 1980,Novantiqua: Rhetorics as a Contemporary Theory, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Watzlawick, P. J., Weakland, J. and Fisch, R.: 1974,Change: Principles of Problem-Formation and Problem Resolution, New York: Norton.
White, J. B.: 1984,When Words Lose Their Meanings, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The author wishes to thank Barbie Zeltzer and Micheal Krippondorf, both of Temple University, fot thier comments. Abridged versions of this paper were presented at the Iowa Conference on Narrative in the Human Sciences,1990 and at the England Symposium in Narratives in the Social Sciences. Commentaries at these conferences were also very useful.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Simons, H.W. Arguing about the ethics of past actions: An analysis of a taped conversation about a taped conversation. Argumentation 9, 225–250 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733110
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733110