Skip to main content
Log in

Editors' introduction

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Without dialogue our views and experiences would be locked within a narrow range. We discover our own limits only when our views are contested in a dialogical encounter. The dialogical partner decenters us from our own egocentricity and opens us to experiences which not only contest our own, but also expand our horizons. This process is prior to any reflective self-reference of the individual to itself.

- Joseph Pilotta (1989, p. 113)

Abstract

Among the challenges posed by postmodernity are significant questions concerning the proper role and even the ultimate legitimacy of traditional theories and practices of argument. This introduction positions the essays that follow against the intellectual landscape of postmodern thought.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Foster, H.: 1983,The Anti-Aesthetic, Bay Press, Post Townsend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F.: 1984, ‘Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism’,New Left Review,146, 53–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilotta, J.: 1989, ‘Introduction to Phenomenological Issues in Communication’, Unpublished Manuscript, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cherwitz, R.A., Hikins, J.W. Editors' introduction. Argumentation 9, 119–122 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733104

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733104

Key words

Navigation