Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 19, Issue 12, pp 1515–1523 | Cite as

On the possible linear term in light coincidence experiments

  • Péter Varga
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

An attempt is made to clarify the confusion about the interpretation of an early experiment aiming to demonstrate the dual nature of light. While interferometer experiments show that photons interact with both mirrors of a Michelson interferometer, it was verified that a photon interacts with one of the detectors put in place of the mirrors. Any deviation from the effect predicted by QED would lead to a term in the coincidence rate linearly proportional to the number of photons; the absence of this term—for the light source used—is in accordance with QED. It is shown that by appropriate preparation of the light source a linear term can be obtained, but this is not in contradiction with QED.

Keywords

Light Source Early Experiment Linear Term Dual Nature Michelson Interferometer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Ádám, L. Jánossy, and P. Varga,Acta Phys. Hung. 4, 301 (1955);Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 16, 408 (1955).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Trevor Marshall and Emilio Santos,Found. Phys. 18, 185 (1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Hanbury Brown and R. Q. Twiss,Nature (London) 177, 27 (1956).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Hanbury Brown,The Intensity Interferometer (Taylor & Francis, London, 1974), p. 8.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. A. M. Dirac:The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 3rd edn. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1947).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roy J. Glauber,Phys. Rev. 131, 2766 (1963).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Jánossy,Acta Phys. Hung. 1, 423 (1952).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    G. I. Taylor,Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 15, 114 (1909).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. J. Dempster and J. Batho,Phys. Rev. 30, 644 (1927).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Jánossy and Zs. Náray,Acta Phys. Hung. 7, 403 (1957);Nuovo Cimento 9, 588 (1958).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. D. Franson and K. A. Potocki,Phys. Rev. A 37, 2511 (1988).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Selényi,Math. Naturw. Ber. Ungarn 27, 76. (1909);Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 35, 444 (1911);Phys. Rev. 56, 477 (1939).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Erwin Schrödinger,Ann. Phys. 61, 69 (1920).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Einstein,Phys. Z. 9, 185 (1909).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. I. VavilovThe Microstructure of Light (in Russian) (Publishing House of the Academy of Science of the USSR, Moscow, 1950).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Jánossy,Nuovo Cimento 6, 111 (1957);12, 369 (1959).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Péter Varga
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Research Institute for PhysicsBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations