Abstract
The purpose of the present paper is to reply to a misleading paper by M. Sachs entitled “Einstein's later view of the Twin Paradox” (TP) (Found. Phys. 15, 977 (1985)). There, by selecting some passages from Einstein's papers, he tried to convince the reader that Einstein changed his mind regarding the asymmetric aging of the twins on different motions. Also Sachs insinuates that he presented several years ago “convincing mathematical arguments” proving that the theory of relativity does not predict asymmetrical aging in the TP. Here we give a definitive treatment to the clocks problem showing that Sachs' “convincing mathematical arguments” are non sequitur. Also, by properly quoting Einstein, we show that his later view of the TP coincides with the one derived from the rigorous theory of time developed in this paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Sachs,Found. Phys. 15, 977 (1985).
A. Einstein,Sidelights of Relativity (E. P. Dutton, New York, 1922; Dover, New York, 1983), p. 35.
A. Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes,” inAlbert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1970), p. 59.
M. Sachs,Phys. Today 24, 23 (1971).
J. Terrel, R. K. Adair, R. W. Williams, F. C. Michel, D. A. Ljung, D. Greenberger, J. P. Matthesen, V. Korenman, T. W. Noonan, R. Price, V. Sandberg, P. H. Polak, S. R. de Groot, G. Lüders, J. Fletcher, and M. Sachs,Phys. Today 25, 9 (1972).
R. K. Sachs and H. Wu,General Relativity for Mathematicians (Springer, New York, 1977).
S. W. Hawking and G. F. R. Ellis,The Large-Scale Structure of Space-time (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1973).
J. L. Synge,Relativity: The General Theory (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971).
J. C. Hafele and R. E. Keating,Science 77, 166 (1968);77, 168 (1968).
D. Apsel,Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 10, 297 (1979).
B. O'Neill,Semi-Riemannian Geometry (Academic, New York, 1983).
C. von Westenholtz,Differential Forms in Mathematical Physics (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978).
W. A. Rodrigues Jr. and J. Tiomno,Found. Phys. 15, 945 (1985).
W. R. Davis,Classical Fields, Particles and the Theory of Relativity (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1970).
W. A. Rodrigues, Jr.,Nuovo Cimento 74B, 199 (1983);Hadronic J. 7, 436 (1984).
J. K. Bemm and P. E. Ehrlich,Global Lorentzian Geometry (Dekker, New York, 1981).
W. A. Rodrigues, Jr.,Lett. Nuovo Cimento 44, 510 (1985).
D. Hestenes,Space-time Algebra (Gordon & Breach, New York, 1986).
D. Hestenes and G. Sobczyk,Clifford Algebra to Geometric Calculus (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1984).
M. Sachs,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 10, 321 (1984).
M. Sachs,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 14, 115 (1975).
R. L. Bishop and S. I. Goldberg,Tensor Analysis on Manifolds (Dover, New York, 1980).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rodrigues, W.A., Rosa, M.A.F. The meaning of time in the theory of relativity and “Einstein's later view of the Twin Paradox”. Found Phys 19, 705–724 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731906
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731906