Skip to main content
Log in

The recognition of three different epitopes for the H-type 2 human blood group determinant by lections ofUlex europaeus, Galactia tenuiflora andPsophocarpus tetragonolobus (Winged Bean)

  • Lectin Papers
  • Published:
Glycoconjugate Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemical mapping of the regions of H-type 2 human blood group-related trisaccharide (Fucα(1–2)Galβ(1–4)GlcNAcβMe) that are recognized by three different lectins, the so-called epitopes, are reviewed together with an account of how and why oligosaccharides form specific complexes with proteins as presently viewed in this laboratory. The occasion is used to report the synthesis of the various mono-O-methyl derivatives of the above trisaccharide that were used in these investigations. Also, Fucα(1–2)Galβ(1–4)XylβMe was synthesized in order to examine whether or not the hydroxymethyl group of the GlcNAc residue participates in the binding reaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Me:

methy

Bn:

benzyl

Ac:

acetyl

Bz:

benzoyl

n-Bu:

n-butyl

NMR:

nuclear magnetic resonance

the GlcNAc:

Gal and Fuc residues of the H-type 2 trisaccharide are designated as the a, b and c structural units, respectively.

References

  1. Nikrad PV, Beierbeck H, Lemieux RU (1992)Can J Chem 70:241–53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lemieux RU (1994)The Alfred Benzon Symposium No. 36, Complex Carbohydrates in Drug Research, Munskaard, Copenhagen, pp. 188–201.

  3. Fischer E (1894)Ber 27:2985–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lemieux RU, Spohr U (1994)Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry 50:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lemieux RU (1978)Chem Soc Rev 7:423–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hindsgaul O, Khare DP, Bach M, Lemieux RU (1985)Can J Chem 63:2653–58.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spohr, U, Paszkiewicz-Hnatiw E, Morishima N, Lemieux RU (1992)Can J Chem 70:254–71.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cromer R, Spohr, U, Khare DP, LePendu J, Lemieux RU (1992)Can J Chem 70:1511–30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lemieux RU, Du M.-H, Spohr U, Acharya S, Surolia A (1994)Can J Chem 72:158–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lemieux RU, Hindsgaul O, Bird P, Narasimhan S, Young WW Jr (1988)Carbohydr Res 178:293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Spohr U, Morishima N, Hindsgaul O, Lemieux RU (1985)Can J Chem 63:2659–63.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lemieux RU, Venot AP, Spohr U, Bird P, Mandal G, Morishima N, Hindsgaul O, Bundle DR (1985)Can J Chem 63:2664–68.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bundle DR, Young NM (1992)Current Opinion in Structural Biology 2:666–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rose DR, Przybylska M, To RJ, Kayden CS, Oomen RP, Vorberg E, Young NM, Bundle DR (1993)Protein Science 2:1106–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lemieux RU, Boullanger PH, Bundle DR, Baker DA, Nagpurkar A, Venot A (1978)Nouveau J Chimie 2:321–29.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lemieux RU, Wong TC, Liao J, Kabat EA (1984)Molecular Immunology 21:751–59.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hindsgaul O, Norberg T, LePendu J, Lemieux RU (1982)Carbohydr Res 109:109–42.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lemieux RU, Cromer R, Spohr U (1988)Can J Chem 66:3083–98.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lemieux RU (1985)Proceedings, VIIIth Int Symp Medicinal Chemistry, Uppsala, Sweden, Swedish Pharmaceutical Press, Stockholm,1:329–51.

  20. Lemieux RU, Delbaere LTJ, Beierbeck H, Spohr U (1991)Ciba Foundation Symposium 158, Wiley, Chichester, 231–48.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Delbaere LTJ, Vandonselaar M, Prasad L, Quail JW, Nikrad PV, Pearlstone JR, Carpenter MR, Smillie LB, Spohr U, Lemieux RU (1990)Can J Chem 68:1116–21.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Delbaere LTJ, Vandonselaar M, Prasad L, Quail JW, Wilson KS, Dauter Z (1993)J Mol Biol 230:950–65.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Shibata S, Goldstein J, Baker DA (1982)J Biol Chem 25:9324–29.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Beierbeck H, Delbaere LTJ, Vandonselaar M, Lemieux RU (1994)Can J Chem 72:463–70.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Beierbeck H, Lemieux RU (1990)Can J Chem 68:820–27.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Good AH, Yau O, Lamontagne LR, Oriol R (1992)Vox Sang 62:180–89.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spohr U, Hindsgaul O, Lemieux RU (1985)Can J Chem 63:2644–52.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Joint Commission Biochemical Nomenclature (1972)J Biol Chem 247:613–35.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Dejter-Juszynski M, Flowers HM (1973)Carbohydr Res 28:61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Flowers HM (1982)Carbohydr Res 99:170–74.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Roth W, Pigman W (1960)J Am Chem Soc 82:4608–11.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fujinaga M, Matsushima Y (1966)Bull Chem Soc Jpn 39:185–90.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hanessian S, Liak TJ, Dixit DM (1981)Carbohydr Res 88:c14-c19.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dejter-Juszynski M, Flowers HM (1971)Carbohydr Res 18:219–26.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Petrakova E, Spohr U, Lemieux RU (1992)Can J Chem 70:233–40.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jeanloz RW, Stoffyn PJ (1962)Methods Carbohydr Chem 1:221–27.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jeanloz RW (1954)J Am Chem Soc 76:5684–86.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lipták A, Jodál I, Nánási P (1975)Carbohydr Res 44:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lee EE, O'Brien E (1975)Carbohydr Res 41:313–17.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Freudenberg K, Smeykal K (1926)Ber 59:100–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Helm RF, Ralph J (1991)J Org Chem 56:7015–21.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Helferich B, Wedemeyer K-F (1949)Justus Liebigs Ann Chem 563:139–45.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Spohr U, Lemieux RU (1988)Carbohydr Res 174:211–37.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wagner D, Verheyden JPH, Moffat JG (1974)J Org Chem 39:24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  45. David S, Thieffry A, Veyières A (1981)J Chem Soc Perkin Trans I, 1796–1801.

  46. Lemieux RU, Hendricks KB, Stick RV, James K (1975)J Am Chem Soc 97:4056–62.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Garegg PJ, Hultberg H, Wallin S (1982)Carbohydr Res 108:97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lemieux RU (1989)Chem Soc. Rev 18:347–74.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pereira MEA, Kisailus EC, Gruezo F, Kabat EA (1978)Arch Biochem Biophys 185:108–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This is paper XV in a series devoted to molecular recognition.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Du, MH., Spohr, U. & Lemieux, R.U. The recognition of three different epitopes for the H-type 2 human blood group determinant by lections ofUlex europaeus, Galactia tenuiflora andPsophocarpus tetragonolobus (Winged Bean). Glycoconjugate J 11, 443–461 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00731281

Keywords

Navigation