Skip to main content
Log in

Plan and counterplan: Notes on moving beyond the crisis in planning theory

  • Published:
Contemporary Crises Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

In developing a working class perspective of planning theory, I have suggested that neither bourgeois nor Marxist planning theories can incorporate the dissensus tactics that are at the heart of working-class movements. Neither can they deal with the class nature of planning nor the class composition of planners. As the current social, political and economic crisis was forced on capital by the struggles (plans) of the working class, it follows that working-class counter-plans should deepen the crisis so that benefits will accrue to “our” side. The development of “our” successful counter-plans will throw “their” planning theory deeper into crisis. Ultimately, crisis resolution must be on the terms of the (ex-)working class.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parson, D. Plan and counterplan: Notes on moving beyond the crisis in planning theory. Contemporary Crises 9, 55–74 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00730687

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00730687

Keywords

Navigation