Summary
CertainPhaseolus vulgaris L. ×P. lunatus L. crosses were performed to study the effect of maternal heterozygosity on development and growth of the interspecific hybrid embryos. Interspecific embryos had a much slower growth rate in vitro compared with embryos derived from self-pollination ofP. vulgaris parents. Thus, interspecific embryos could be identified by growth rate in vitro. TheP. vulgaris maternal genotype affected both the number and size of 15-day-old interspecific embryos. Specifically, ‘76 Spartan Arrow’ produced significantly more interspecific embryos than did ‘Great Northern’ as the seed parent, while maternal intraspecific hybrids produced smaller embryos than did maternal pure lines. There were no reciprocal differences between hybrid maternal parents for embryo number or size. Embryo size at excision and final size after culturing were closely correlated (r2=+0.93). The crossP. vulgaris ‘76 Spartan Arrow’ ×P. lunatus P.I. 214170 produced both the largest mean size at excision and the fastest growth in culture, indicating that specific combining ability affected both characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-YasiriS. A. & D. P.Coyne, 1966. Interspecific hybridization in the genusPhaseolus. Crop Sci. 6: 59–60.
AlvarezM. N., P. D.Ascher & D. W.Davis, 1981. Interspecific hybridization inEuphaseolus through embryo rescue. HortScience 6: 541–543.
BuishandT. J., 1956. The crossing of beans (Phaseolus spp.). Euphytica 5: 41–50.
CochranW. G. & G. M.Cox, 1957. Experimental design. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, New York.
FreytagG. F., 1979. Metaxenia effects on pod size development in the common bean. J. Hered. 70: 444–446.
HawkinsC. F. & A. M.Evans, 1973. Elucidating the behaviour of pollen tubes in intra- and interspecific pollinations ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. andP. coccineus Lam. Euphytica 22: 378–385.
HonmaS., 1955. A technique for artificial culturing of bean embryos. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 65: 405–408.
HonmaS., 1956. A bean interspecific hybrid. J. Hered. 47: 217–220.
HonmaS. & O.Heeckt, 1959. Interspecific hybrid betweenPhaseolus vulgaris andP. lunatus. J. Hered. 50: 233–237.
HuclP. & G. J.Scoles, 1985. Interspecific hybridization in the common bean: a review. HortScience 20: 352–357.
MokD. W. S., M. C.Mok & A.Rabakoarihanta, 1978. Interspecific hybridization ofPhaseolus vulgaris withP. Lunatus andP. acutifolius. Theor. Appl. Genet. 52: 209–215.
MurashigeT. & F.Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.
PrattR. C., R. A.Bressan & P. M.Hasegawa, 1985. Genotypic diversity enhances recovery of hybrids and fertile backcrosses ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. ×P. acutifolius A.Gray. Euphytica 34: 329–344.
ShiiC. T., A.Rabakoarihanta, M. C.Mok & D. W. S.Mok, 1982. Embryo development in reciprocal crosses ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. andP. coccineus Lam. Theor. Appl. Genet. 62: 59–64.
SmarttJ., 1970. Interspecific hybridization between cultivated American species of the genusPhaseolus. Euphytica 19: 480–489.
SmarttJ., 1979. Interspecific hybridization in the grain legumes-a review. Econ. Bot. 33: 329–337.
SpragueG. F. & L. A.Tatum, 1942. General vs. specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 34: 923–932.
SteelR. G. D. & J. H.Torrie, 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York, New York.
WadeB. L., 1943. An improvement in bean crossing technique. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 43: 187–188.
WallJ. R. & T. L.York, 1960. Gametic diversity as an aid in interspecific hybridization inPhaseolus and inCucurbita. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 75: 419–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Journal Paper No. J-12208 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, Iowa. Project No. 2495
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leonard, M.F., Stephens, L.C. & Summers, W.L. Effect of maternal genotype on development ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. ×P. lunatus L. interspecific hybrid embryos. Euphytica 36, 327–332 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00730679
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00730679