Skip to main content
Log in

Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals

I. Selection methods in breeding for yield

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The limitations of the pedigree and mass methods of selection in the improvement of self pollinating cereal crops are discussed and the value of quantitative data in the early generations of selection is emphasised. Two systems of selection which provide such data have been introduced at the Cambridge Plant Breeding Institute.

In one, known as the F2 progeny method of selection, the progenies of selected F2 plants are grown in yield trials without further selection during F4, F5 and F6 after which single plant selections are made within the more promising progenies.

In the other system, known as the pedigree trial method of selection, normal pedigree selection is carried out in F2 and F3. In the F4 generation single plants are selected from the better families for continued pedigree selection and within each of these families the remaining plants are bulked to give grain for a yield trial in the following year. This process is repeated in F5 and F6, the grain for trial being in each case obtained from the progeny rows and not from the preceding trial.

The use of these methods is illustrated by reference to wheat hybrids grown at Cambridge, and the data obtained is shown to be useful in comparing the value of different parental combinations as well as in assessing the relative merits of the selections within each cross.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AtkinsR. E., and MurphyH. C., Evaluation of yield potentialities of oat crosses from bulk hybrid tests. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 41 (1949): 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BjaanesM. Undersøkelser i vårkveiteforedling (Studies in spring wheat breeding). Forskning og Forsøk i Landbruket (Research in norwegian Agriculture), Oslo 2 (1951): 84–139.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ChristianC. S. and GrayS. G., Interplant competition in mixed wheat populations and its relation to single plant selection. J. Coun. sci. industr. Res. Aust. 14 (1941): 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  4. FowlerW. L. and HeyneE. G., Evaluation of bulk hybrid tests for predicting performance of pure line selections in hard red winter wheat. Agron. J. 47 (1955): 430–434.

    Google Scholar 

  5. FreyK. J., The use of F2 lines in predicting the performance of F3 selections in two barley crosses. Agron. J. 46 (1954): 541–544.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goulden, C. H., Design techniques and testing. Report of the International Wheat-Stem-Rust Conference, Winnipeg, Canada. 1953, pp. 113–114.

  7. GrafiusJ. E., NelsonW. L. and DirksV. A., The heritability of yield in barley as measured by early generation bulked progenies. Agron. J. 44 (1952): 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harlan, H. V., Martini, M. L. and Stevens, H., A study of methods in barley breeding. U.S.D.A. Techn. Bull.720, Washington, 1940.

  9. HarringtonJ. B., Yielding capacity of wheat crosses as indicated by bulk hybrid tests. Canad. J. Res. 18c (1940): 578–584.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HutchinsonJ. B., et al., Studies in plant breeding technique. III. Crop analysis and varietal improvement in malvi jowar (Andropogon sorghum). Ind. J. agric. Sci. 8 (1938): 131–152.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ImmerF. R., Relation between yielding ability and homozygosis in barley crosses. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 33 (1941): 200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  12. JinksJ. L., The analysis of continuous variation in a diallel cross ofNicotiana rustica varieties. Genetics 39 (1954): 767–788.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KleyF. K.van der, The efficiency of some selection methods in populations resulting from crosses between self-fertilising plants. Euphytica 4 (1955): 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  14. LaudeH. H. and SwansonA. F., Natural selection in varietal mixtures of winter wheat. J. Amer. Soc. Agron. 34 (1942): 270–274.

    Google Scholar 

  15. LuptonF. G. H. and WhitehouseR. N. H., Selection methods in the breeding of high yielding wheat varieties. Heredity 9 (1955): 150–151 (Abst).

    Google Scholar 

  16. MatherK., Biometrical Genetics. Methuen, London. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Newman, L. H., Plant Breeding in Scandinavia. The Canad. Seed Growers' Ass. 1912, pp. 193.

  18. Nilsson-EhleH., Arbetena med hvete och havre vid Svalöf under år 1090, Sv. Utsädesf. Tidskr. 20 (1910): 332–353.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SakaiK., (Theoretical studies on the technique of plant breeding. I. Value of heritability in bulks and plant progenies of successive hybrid generations in autogamous plants). (Japanese, original not seen). Jap. J. Breeding 4 (1954): 145–148.

    Google Scholar 

  20. WhitehouseR. N. H., Breeding for yield in the cereals. Heredity 7 (1953): 146–147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lupton, F.G.H., Whitehouse, R.N.H. Studies on the breeding of self-pollinating cereals. Euphytica 6, 169–184 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729886

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00729886

Keywords

Navigation