The purpose of knowledge: pragmatism and the praxis of marxist criminology

Abstract

This paper revives and revises the argument that there is no place for a concept of crime in marxist theory, and consequently that there is no theoretical justification for the development of marxist criminology. However, earlier essays along these lines have adopted a rationalist epistemology in advancing this case — with its attendant difficulties of idealism, privileged conceptualization and inflexibility. The present paper attempts to escape such problems, and to extend the critique of criminological theorization, by developing its case on the basis of a pragmatist epistemology. It is argued that the conflicting aims of marxist theory and the bourgeois legal theory from which ‘crime’ is transferred make it difficult for marxist criminology to generate a unified theory to guide political practice and research. Moreover, Marxists' privileging of the concept of crime may be systematically blinding them to political developments which render criminology historically obsolescent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abel, R. (1981). ‘A critique of American tort law’,British Journal of Law and Society 8: 199–231.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abel, R. (1982). ‘The contradictions of informal justice’, in: R. Abel (ed.)The politics of informal justice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, P. (1980).Arguments within English marxism. London: NLB/Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balbus, I. (1977). ‘Commodity from and legal form. An essay on the relative autonomy of the law’,Law and Society Review 11: 571–588.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bankowski, Z., Mungham, G. and Young, P. (1977). ‘Radical criminology or radical criminologist?’Contemporary Crises 1: 37–52.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barnett, H. (1979). ‘Wealth, Crime and Capital Accumulation’,Contemporary Crises 3: 171–180.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Block, A. and Chambliss, W. (1981).Organizing crime. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boehringer, G., Brown, D., Edgeworth, B., Hogg, R. and Ramsay, I. (1983). ‘Law and order for progressives? An Australian response’,Crime and Social Justice 9: 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cain, M. (1985). ‘Beyond informal justice’,Contemporary crises 9: 287–327.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carson, W. (1980). ‘The ambiguity of white collar crime’, in: M. Fitzgerald et al. (eds)Crime and Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carson, W. (1981).The other price of Britain's oil. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Charney, J. (1974). ‘The need for constitutional protections for defendants in civil penalty cases’,Cornell Law Review 59: 478–497.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke, D. (1978). ‘Marxism, justice and the justice model’,Contemporary Crises 2: 27–62.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen, S. (1979). ‘The punitive city. Notes on the dispersal of social control’,Contemporary Crises 3: 339–363.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen, S. (1984).Visions of social control. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cutler, A., Hindess, B., Hirst, P. and Hussain, A. (1977).Marx's ‘Capital’ and capital today. Vol. 1. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fitzpatrick, P. (1983). ‘Marxism and legal pluralism’,Australian Journal of Law and Society 1: 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foucault, M. (1977).Discipline and Punish. The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Frankel, B. (1983).Beyond the state? Dominant theories and socialist strategies. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freese, L. and Sell, J. (1980). ‘Constructing axiomatic theories in sociology’, in: L. Freese (ed.)Theoretical methods in sociology. Seven essays. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freiberg, A. (1984).The civil offense. Melbourne: Monash University. Unpublished LLM Thesis.

  22. Freiberg, A. and O'Malley, P. (1984). ‘State intervention and the civil offense’,Law and Society Review 18: 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Garland, D. (1985). ‘The Criminal and His Science’,British Journal of Criminology 25: 109–137.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Greenberg, D. (1981).Crime and capitalism. Readings in marxist criminology. New York: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J. and Roberts, B. (1978).Policing the crisis. Mugging, the state, and law and order. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Henry, S. (1985). ‘Community justice, capitalist society and human agency’,Law and Society Review 19: 303–321.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hinch, R. (1983). ‘Marxist criminology in the 1970s: Clarifying the clutter’,Crime and Social Justice 19: 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hindess, B. and Hirst, P. (1977).Mode of Production and Social Formation. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hirst, P. (1975). ‘Marx and Engels on law, crime and morality’, in: I. Taylor, P. Walton and J. Young (eds) (1975).Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hulsman, L. (1986). ‘Critical Criminology and the Concept of Crime’,Contemporary Crises 10: 63–80.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kerruish, V. and Duncanson, I. (1986). ‘The regulation of civil liberty’,Law in Context 4: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lea, J. and Young, J. (1984).What is to be done about law and order? London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Linebaugh, P. (1976). ‘Karl Marx, the theft of wood and working class composition’,Crime and Social Justice 6: 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Matza, D. (1969).Becoming deviant. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  35. O'Malley, P. (1979). ‘Class struggle, land and social banditry’,Social Problems 26: 271–283.

    Google Scholar 

  36. O'Malley, P. (1982a). ‘The invisible censor. Civil law and the state delegation of press control 1890–1952’,Media, Culture and Society 4: 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  37. O'Malley, P. (1982b). ‘Historical practice and the production of marxist legal theory’,Crime and Social Justice 18: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  38. O'Malley, P. (1985). ‘The illegal sector of capital. A theoretical examination of “Organizing crime”’,Contemporary Crises 9: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  39. O'Malley, P. (1987a). ‘Marxist Theory and Marxist Criminology’,Crime and Social Justice.

  40. O'Malley, P. (1987b). ‘Regulating contradictions. The Australian Press Council and the dispersal of social control’,Law and Society Review 21: 101–126.

    Google Scholar 

  41. O'Malley, P. (Forthcoming). ‘The Place of Crime in Popular History’, in: V. Burgmann and J. Lee (eds)Australia Since the British invasion, Vol. 3. Melbourne: McPhee Gribble.

  42. Pashukanis, E. (1978).Law and marxism. A general theory. London: Ink Links.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Reasons, C., Ross, L. and Patterson, C. (1982). ‘Your money or your life. Workers' health in Canada’,Crime and Social Justice 17: 55–60.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rorty, R. (1982).Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schwendinger, J. and Schwendinger, H. (1975). ‘Defenders of order or guardians of human rights?’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Spitzer, S. (1980). ‘Left Wing’ Criminology — An Infant Disorder?’, in: J. Inciardi (ed.)Radical Criminology: The Coming Crisis. Beverly Hills: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Spitzer, S. (1982). ‘The dialectics of formal and informal control’, in: R. Abel (ed.)The politics of informal justice. Vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Steinert, H. (1986). ‘Beyond crime and punishment’,Contemporary Crises 10: 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sutherland, E. (1949).White Collar Crime. New York: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Taylor, I. (1981).Law and order. Arguments for socialism. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Taylor, I. and Walton, P. (1975). ‘Radical Deviancy Theory: A Reply to Paul Q. Hirst’, in: I. Taylor, P. Walton and J. Young (eds) (1975).Critical Criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Taylor, I. (1975). ‘Critical Criminology in Britain. Review and Prospects’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Thompson, E. (1975).Whigs and hunters. The origins of the Black Act. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Thompson, E. (1978). ‘The poverty of theory’, in: E. Thompson (ed.)The poverty of theory and other essays. London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Winslow, C. (1975). ‘Sussex smugglers’, in: D. Hay, P. Linebaugh, J. Rule, E. Thompson and C. Winslow (eds)Albion's fatal tree. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Young, J. (1975). ‘Working Class Criminology’, in: I. Taylor et al. (eds)Critical criminology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Malley, P. The purpose of knowledge: pragmatism and the praxis of marxist criminology. Contemporary Crises 12, 65–79 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728659

Download citation

Keywords

  • Unify Theory
  • International Relation
  • Legal Theory
  • Political Development
  • Theoretical Justification