Advertisement

A crack growth criterion in research on cyclic cracking resistance in elevated-plasticity materials

  • O. M. Romaniv
  • G. M. Nikiforchin
  • O. Z. Student
  • I. D. Skripnik
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Conclusion

Existing methods of determining parameter δ have not been widely used in testing because of imperfections. The basis of the proposed method is to estimate features in the strain pattern around a crack vertex that make themselves felt in displacement discontinuity. The method is based on measuring the distances between marks on the side surface. These are used in constructing the increment in the measurement baseline in a loading cycle as a function of the magnitude of the latter, which is extrapolated to zero baseline to determine the true Δδ.

The method has been tested on electrotechnically pure aluminum as a model material with high plasticity. It is found to be possible to use the A6 criterion determined by this method. The linear mechanics of failure does not give an unambiguous description for fatigue failure in aluminum because the crack growth kinetics may be dependent on the crack length. At the same time, the growth rate is unambigously determined by the vertex cyclic opening over a wide range in crack length. In a log-log plot, the kinetic diagram for fatigue failure is described satisfactorily by a straight line, so 6 is recommended as a better criterion for evaluating cyclic cracking resistance in plastic materials.

Keywords

Crack Length Growth Kinetic Plastic Material Pure Aluminum Cyclic Opening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    V. V. Panasyuk, “Deformation criteria in failure mechanics,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 1, 7–17 (1986).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Ya. Yarema, “Principles and problems in fatigue failure mechanics,” Ibid., No. 5, 17–29 (1987).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    V. T. Troshchenko, V. V. Pokrovskii, and A. V. Prokopenko, Cracking Resistance in Materials under Cyclic Loading [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. A. Makhutov, Deformation Criteria for Failure and Strength Calculations for Structure Components [in Russian], Mashinostroenie, Moscow (1981).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. T. Troshchenko, V. V. Pokrovskii, and V. T. Kaplunenko, “Effects of specimen size on cyclic cracking resistance characteristics for heat-resistant steels,” Probl. No. 4, 3–9 and No. 6, 13–18 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. N. Lavrishin, A. Z. Student, M. P. Demyd, and B. P. Kolos, “Features of determining the cyclic cracking resistance in fluoroplastics,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 4, 71–75 (1988).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Methods for Crack Opening Displacement Testing, BS 5762, British Standards Intitution (1977–1979).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    GOST 25.506-85: Strength Calculations and Tests: Methods for Mechanical Tests on Metals: Determination of Cracking Resistance Characteristics (Failure Viscosity) on State Loading [in Russian], Standartov, Moscow (1985).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. T. Troshchenko, P. V. Yasii, V. V. Pokrovskii, and Yu. S. Skorenko, “Methods and results in research on fatigue crack opening,” Probl. Prochn., No. 10, 8–13 (1987).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. N. Romaniv, Failure Viscosity in Constructional Steels [in Russian], Metallurgiya, Moscow (1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    V. N. Vapnika (ed.), Algorithms and Programs for Recovering Relationships [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. V. Panasyuk, A. E. Andreikiv, and V. Z. Parton, “The principles of failure mechanics,” in: Failure Mechanics and Material Strength: Handbook [in Russian], Vol. 1, V. V. Panasyuk, (ed.) Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1988).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    RD 50-345-82: Statements of Method: Strength Calculations and Tests in Engineering: Mechanical Test Methods for Metals: Determining Cracking Resistance Characteristics (Failure Viscosity) on Cyclic Loading [in Russian], Izd. Standartov, Moscow (1983).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. N. Nikiforchin, B. N. Andrusiv, A. V. Vol'demarov, and M. A. Kutsyn, “Estimating fatigue crack opening effects,” Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Mater., No. 5, 100–103 (1982).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. N. Nikiforchin, A. A. Popov, B. N. Andrusiv, and Yu. V. Zima, “The effects of the scale factor on cyclic-cracking resistance in plastic steels in the low-amplitude loading range,” Ibid., No. 4, 57–64 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. M. Romaniv
    • 1
  • G. M. Nikiforchin
    • 1
  • O. Z. Student
    • 1
  • I. D. Skripnik
    • 1
  1. 1.Karpenko Physicomechanics InstituteAcademy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSRLvov

Personalised recommendations