Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 53–78 | Cite as

Systems for reusing hypermedia courseware

  • Roy Rada
Article

Abstract

Three systems of differing complexity have been built which support the development of courseware libraries for reuse at three differing organizations. One system was developed for a handful of authors at a small company, one for a university team of about twenty-five people, and one for a company with about one hundred authors. The small company has not found the cost-benefit balances attractive enough to continue investment. The university team has published several products with its collaborative hypermedia system. The system for the large company includes extremely sophisticated library structures and coordination mechanisms but is a challenge for the new user to fully understand. As is often the case with reuse, the institutional commitment to courseware reuse and the ease of use of the tools are critical factors in success. Based on the experiences with the first three courseware reuse systems and the increased popularity of the World Wide Web, a new courseware reuse methodology has been implemented on the World Wide Web.

Keywords

reuse WWW interactive multimedia digital libraries education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S., Acquah, “Reuse of Courseware,” M. Phil. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W., Agresti, “Framework for a Flexible Development Process,” in New Paradigms for Software Development, William, Agresti (Ed.), pp. 11–14, IEEE, New York, 1986.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A., Avner, “Production of computer-based instructional materials,” in Issues in Instructional Systems Development, H.F., O'Neil, Jr. (Ed.), pp. 133–180, Academic Press, New York, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H., Bahrami, “The Emerging Flexible Organization: Perspectives from Silicon Valley,” IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 94–103, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T., Berners-Lee, R., Cailliau, A., Luotonen, H.F., Nielsen, and A., Secret, “The World-Wide Web,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 76–82, August 1994.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.J. Biggerstaff, “Design Recovery for Maintenance and Reuse,” Computer, pp. 36–49, July 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boeing Company, IBM Federal Systems Company, and Unisys Corporation, STARS Conceptual Framework for Reuse Process (CFRP), Volume 1: Definition, Version 3.0, United States Air Force, Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, October 25, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N.S., Borenstein, Multimedia Applications Development with the Andrew Toolkit, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Bourdeau, Automating Instructional Planning in NATO ASI—Automating Instructional Design, Development and Delivery, Springer-Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.K., Buford, “Architectures and Issues for Distributed Multimedia Systems,” in Multimedia Systems, J.K., Buford (Ed.), pp. 45–63, ACM Press, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.A., Burton, R.W., Aragon, S.A., Bailey, K.D., Koehler and L.A., Mayes, “The reusable software library,” IEEE Software, Vol. 4, pp. 25–33, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    G., Caldiera and V.R., Basili, “Identifying and Qualifying Reusable Software Components,” IEEE Software, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 25–33, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C., Chen and R., Rada, “A Conceptual Model for Supporting Collaborative Authoring and Reuse,” Knowledge Organization, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 88–93, 1994.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C., Chen, R., Rada and A., Zeb, “An Extended Fisheye View Browser for Collaborative Writing,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 40, pp. 859–878, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J., Cheng, “A Reusability-Based Software Development Environment,” Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 57–62, April 1994.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.E., Egan, J.R., Remde, L.M., Gomez, T.K., Landauer, J., Eberhardt, and C.C., Lochbaum, “Formative designevaluation of ‘SuperBook’,” ACM Transactions of Information Systems, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 30–57, January 1989.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W.B., Frakes and P.B., Gandel, “Representing Reusable Software,” Information Software Technology, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 653–664, December 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R., Goldman-Segall, “Interpreting Video Data: Introducing a ‘Significance Measure’ to Layer Descriptions,” Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 261–281, 1993.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.E., Goodman, L.I., Press, S.R., Ruth, and A.M., Ruthowski “The Global Diffusion of the Internet: Patterns and Problems,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 27–31, August 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.L., Griss, “Software Reuse: from library to factory,” IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 548–566, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    GTE Government Systems, NATO Standard for Development of Reusable Software Components, NATO Communications and Information Systems Agency, Brussels, Belgium, March 1992.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    GTE Government Systems, NATO Standard for Management of a Reusable Software Component Library, NATO Communications and Information Systems Agency, Brussels, Belgium, March 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    GTE Government Systems, NATO Standard for Software Reuse Procedures, NATO Communications and Information Systems Agency, Brussels, Belgium, March 1992.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    H., Hahn and R., Stout, The Internet Complete Reference, McGraw-Hill, Berkeley, California, 1994.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    F., Halasz and M., Schwartz, “The Dexter Hypertext Reference Model,” Communications of the ACM, pp. 30–39, ACM Press, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    L., Hardman, D.C.A., Bulterman, and G.van, Rossum, “The Amsterdam Hypermedia Model: Adding Time and Context to the Dexter Model,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 50–62, February 1994.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    T.C., Jones, “Reusability in Programming: A Survey of the State of the Art,” IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 488–494, September 1984.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R., Joos, “Software Reuse at Motorola,” IEEE Software, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 42–47, September 1994.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    B. Leiner, “Internet Technology,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 8, p. 32, August 1994.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    K., Liberman and J.L., Rich, “Lotus Notes Databases: the Foundation of a Virtual Library,” Databases, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 33–47, June 1993.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    I.M. Marshall, W.B. Samson, and P.I. Dugard, “Multimedia courseware cost modelling,” European Cost Modelling Conference'94, pp. 27.1–27.18, 1994.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J.S., Mendes, “Educational Access and Support Tools Distribution Service,” Report for DELTA Project D2016, MARI Computer Systems, Tyne and Wear, England, 1994.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    B., Meyer, “Reusability: The case for object-oriented design,” IEEE Software, Vol. 4, pp. 50–63, 1987.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    H., Mili and R., Rada, “Merging Thesauri: Principles and Evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 204–220, 1988.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    H., Mili and H., Li, “Data Abstraction in SoftClass, an OO CASE Tool for Software Reuse,” in Proceedings of TOOLS '93, pp. 133–149, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1993.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    H., Mili, R., Rada, W., Wang, K., Strickland, C., Boldyreff, L., Olsen, J., Witt, J., Heger, W., Scherr, and P., Elzer, “Practitioner and SoftClass: A Comparative Study of Two Software Reuse Research Projects,” Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 147–171, 1994.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Z., Min and R., Rada, “MUCH Electronic Publishing Environment — Principles and Practices,” Journal American Society Information Science, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 300–309, June 1994.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. O'Connor, C. Mansour, J. Turner-Harris, and G.H. Campbell, Jr., “Reuse in Command-and-Control Systems,” IEEE Software, pp. 70–79, September 1994.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. Pentland, R. Picard, G. Davenport, and R. Welsh, “The BT/MIT Project on Advanced Image Tools for Telecommunications: an Overview,” Proceedings 2nd International Conference on Image Communications, 1993.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    D., Persico, I., Sarti, and Viarengo, “Browsing a Database of Multimedia Learning Material,” Interactive Learning International, Vol. 8, pp. 213–235, 1992.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    R. Prieto-Diaz and P. Freeman, “Classifying Software for Reusability,” IEEE Software, pp. 6–16, January 1987.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    R., Rada, J., Backus, T., Giampa, S., Goel, and C., Gibbs, “Computerized Guides to Journal Selection,” Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 6, No.3, pp. 173–184, 1987.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    R. Rada, “Guidelines for Multiple Users Creating Hypertext: SQL and HyperCard Experiments,” in Computers and Writing: Models and Tools, Patrik Holt and Noel Williams (Eds.), pp. 61–89, Black-well/Ablex Publishing, 1989.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    R., Rada, “Hypertext writing and document reuse: the role of a semantic net,” Electronic Publishing, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 3–13, 1990.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    R., Rada, A., Zeb, G.-N., You, A., Michailidis, and M., Mhashi, “Collaborative Hypertext and the MUCH System,” Journal Information Science: Principles & Practice, Vol. 17, pp. 191–196, 1991.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    R., Rada, Hypertext: from Text to Expertext, McGraw-Hill, London, 1991.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    R., Rada, “Converting a Textbook to Hypertext,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 294–315, 1992.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    R. Rada, W. Wang, H. Mili, J. Heger, and W. Scherr, “Software Reuse: from Text to Hypertext,” Software Engineering Journal, pp. 311–321, September 1992.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    R. Rada, A. Deakin, and M. Beer, “Collaborative Development of Courseware: Part One-Examples,” Journal of Intelligent Tutoring Media, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1993.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    R., Rada and G.S., Carson, “Standards: the New Media,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 37, No. 9, pp. 23–25, 1994.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    R., Rada, Software Reuse, Intellect, Oxford, England, 1994.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    R., Rada and P., Ramsey, “Introduction,” in Medical Informatics CD-ROM, R., Rada and R., Phillip (Eds.), ACM SIGBIO, New York, November 1994.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    R., Rada, Interactive Media, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    R. E. Schooley, “Computer-Based Training (CBT) Cost Estimating Algorithm for Courseware (CEAC),” Interservice Industry Training Systems Conference, pp. 319–328, 1988.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    P.M., Senge, The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday/Currency, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    B., Shneiderman, and G., Kearsley, Hypertext Hands-On!, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1989.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    H.T., Smith, P.A., Hannessy, and G.A., Lunt, “The activity model environment: An object-oriented framework for describing organizational communication,” Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 160–172, Computer Sciences House, Slough, England, 1989.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    D., Soergel, Indexing Languages and Thesauri: Construction and Maintenance, Wiley, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Software Technology for Adaptable Reliable Systems, Organization Domain Modelling, Unisys STARS Technical Report STARS-UC-05156/024/00, Advanced Research Projects Agency, STARS Technology Center, Arlington, Virginia, July 1993.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    J.R., Tiro and H., Gregorius, “Management of Reuse at IBM,” IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 612–615, 1993.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Virginia Center of Excellence for Software Reuse and Technology Transfer, Reuse Adoption Guidebook. Technical Report SPC-92051-CMC, Software Productivity Consortium, Herndon, Virginia, November, 1992.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    M., Wasmund, “Implementing Critical Success Factors in Software Reuse,” IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 595–611, 1993.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    J., Williams, “Birth of a Biomedical Videodisc,” Viewfinder: The British Universities Film & Video Council Magazine, pp. 16–17, May 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy Rada
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations