Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two-stage coking of sour feedstocks

  • Published:
Chemistry and Technology of Fuels and Oils Aims and scope

Summary

  1. 1.

    It has been shown that one of the methods for producing cokes with lower sulfur contents from sour feedstocks is pretreatment or proper selection of feedstock.

  2. 2.

    Two-stage coking has been studied with two sour extracts of different origin. It has been shown that the coke/feedstock ratios of sulfur content are 1.24 and 0.98 for the first-stage coking of these extracts, but are reduced to 0.6 and 0.47 in the second-stage coking.

  3. 3.

    On the basis of the chemical group composition of the coker feedstocks, it can be postulated that the sulfur compounds present in the chromatogrpahic fractions of heavy aromatic hydrocarbons are less resistant to thermal breakdown than the sulfur compounds in the light and medium aromatic hydrocarbon fractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. A. F. Krasyukov, Petroleum Coke [in Russian], Khimiya, Moscow (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Z. I. Syunyaev, Upgrading and Application of Petroleum Coke [in Russian], Khimiya, Moscow (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. K. Sebott, Quart. Colo. School Mines,47, No. 3, 1–22 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. J. Imkasiewicz and G. C. Johnson, Ind. Eng. Chem.,52, No. 8, 675–677 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. G. Rogachev, E. V. Smidovich, N. D. Voloshin, and B. F. Morozov, Neftepererab, i Neftekhim., No. 3, 24–27 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  6. U. S. Pat. 2,921,017 (1960); 31779584 (1965).

  7. Henry C. Messman, Oil Gas J.,67, No. 38, 142–144 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. S. Kazanskaya and E. V. Smidovich, Khim. i Tekhnol. Topliv i Masel, No. 3, 22–26 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ya. A. Botnikov, D. Kh. Teregulov, and Z. V. Gerasicheva, Khim. i Tekhnol. Topliv i Masel, No. 3, 14–18 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carleton B. Scott, Chem. Ind. (London), No. 26, 22–29 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. D. Filyushina, F. B. Zhibitskaya, N. P. Zaitseva, and E. V. Smidovich, Khim. i Tekhnol. Topliv i Masel, No. 11, 18–21 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. V. Dolmatov, Candidate's Dissertation, UNI, Ufa (1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. I. M. Gubkin Moscow Institute of the Petrochemical and Gas Industry (MINKh i GP), USSR

    T. I. Bocharova, E. V. Smidovich & M. O. Lando

Authors
  1. T. I. Bocharova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. V. Smidovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. O. Lando
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Khimiya i Tekhnologiya Topliv i Masel, No. 3, pp. 6–9, March, 1973.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bocharova, T.I., Smidovich, E.V. & Lando, M.O. Two-stage coking of sour feedstocks. Chem Technol Fuels Oils 9, 175–178 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717148

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00717148

Keywords

Search

Navigation