Comparison of tests of physical fitness of student teachers at Cape Town

  • A. W. Sloan
Article

Summary

The Harvard step test (modified for women) and a modified AAHPER test battery were performed by 144 White and Coloured student teachers, of whom 45 were students of physical education (PE). The rapid fitness index (RFI) was calculated for the Harvard step test and a composite criterion of fitness was derived from the results of the seven tests which comprise the AAHPER test battery.

For men and for women there was a highly significant correlation between the two estimates of physical fitness (RFI and AAHPER criterion) and a good correlation between the criterion and each of the individual AAHPER tests, the highest being with the standing broad jump. The correlation between RFI and individual AAHPER tests was poor in men but good in women. In both sexes the highest correlation was with the 600-yard run.

In general, both men and women PE students were fitter than their controls but there was no consistent difference between White and Coloured students in the results of the fitness tests although the White men and women were taller and heavier. The observed differences are probably not due to race but to different degrees of physical activity.

References

  1. American Association for Health, physical Education and Recreation: Youth fitness test manual. Washington, D. C.: Aahper 1958.Google Scholar
  2. Arnett, C.: The purdue motor fitness test batteries for senior high school girls. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.33, 323–328 (1962).Google Scholar
  3. Barrow, H. M.: Test of motor ability for college men. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.25, 253–260 (1954).Google Scholar
  4. Brouha, L., A. Graybiel, andC. W. Heath: The step test: a simple method of measuring fitness for hard muscular work in adult man. Rev. canad. Biol.2, 86–91 (1943).Google Scholar
  5. Campbell, W. R., andR. H. Pohndorf: Physical fitness of British and United States children. Phys. Educ.53, 48–56 (1961).Google Scholar
  6. Chrastek, J., I. Stolz, andL. Samek: On determination of physical fitness by the step test. J. Sport Med. (Torino)5, 61–66 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. Cureton, T. K.: Physical fitness appraisal and guidance. St. Louis: Mosby 1947.Google Scholar
  8. ,W. J. Huffman, L. Welser, R. W. Kireilis, andD. E. Latham: Endurance of young men: Analysis of endurance exercises and methods of evaluating motor fitness. Washington, D. C.: Society for Research in Child Development 1945.Google Scholar
  9. De Vries, H. A., andC. E. Klafs: Prediction of maximal oxygen intake from submaximal tests. J. Sport Med. (Torino)5, 207–214 (1965).Google Scholar
  10. Falls, H. B., A. H. Ismail, D. F. Macleod, J. E. Wiebers, J. E. Christian, andM. V. Kessler: Development of physical fitness test batteries by factor analysis techniques. J. Sport Med. (Torino)5, 185–197 (1965).Google Scholar
  11. Fowler, W. M., andG. G. Gardner: The relation of cardiovascular tests to measurements of motor performance and skills. Pediatrics32, 778–789 (1963).Google Scholar
  12. Gallagher, J. R., andL. Brouha: Dynamic physical fitness in adolescence. Yale J. Biol. Med.15, 657–658 (1943).Google Scholar
  13. : Physical fitness: its evaluation and significance. J. Amer. med. Ass.125, 834–838 (1944).Google Scholar
  14. Gross, E. A., andJ. A. Casciani: The value of age, height, and weight as a classification device for secondary school students in the seven Aahper youth fitness tests. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.33, 51–58 (1962).Google Scholar
  15. Havlicek, F. J.: Speed sit-ups. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Eduo.15, 75–77 (1944).Google Scholar
  16. Hettinger, T., N. C. Birkhead, S. M. Horvath, B. Issekutz, andK. Rodahl: Assessment of physical work capacity. J. appl. Physiol.16, 153–156 (1961).Google Scholar
  17. Karpovich, P. V.: Physiology of muscular activity. 4th ed. Philadelphia-London: Saunders 1953.Google Scholar
  18. Knuttgen, H. G., andK. Steendahl: Fitness of Danish school-children during the course of one academic year. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.34, 34–40 (1963).Google Scholar
  19. Mohr, D. R.: The measurement of certain aspects of the physical fitness of college women. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.15, 340–349 (1944).Google Scholar
  20. Montoye, H. J.: The “Harvard step test” and work capacity. Rev. canad. Biol.11, 491–499 (1953).Google Scholar
  21. Nicks, D. C., andE. A. Fleishman: What do physical fitness tests measure? A review of factor analytic studies. Educ. psychol. measur.22, 77–95 (1962).Google Scholar
  22. O'Connor, M. E., andT. K. Cureton: Motor fitness tests for high school girls. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.16, 302–314 (1945).Google Scholar
  23. Olree, H., C. Stevens, T. Nelson, G. Agnevic, andR. T. Clark: Evaluation of the Aahper youth fitness test. J. Sport Med. (Torino)5, 67–71 (1965).Google Scholar
  24. Ponthieux, N. A., andD. G. Barker: Relationship between socio-economic status and physical fitness measures. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.36, 464–467 (1965).Google Scholar
  25. Powell, E., andE. C. Howe: Motor ability tests for high school girls. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.10, 81–88 (1939).Google Scholar
  26. Rodahl, K., P.-O. Åstrand, N. C. Birkhead, T. Hettinger, B. Issekutz jr., D. M. Jones, andR. Weaver: Physical work capacity: a study of some children and young adults in the United States. Arch. environm. Hlth2, 499–510 (1961).Google Scholar
  27. Seltzer, C. C.: Anthropometric characteristics and physical fitness. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.17, 10–20 (1946).Google Scholar
  28. Sloan, A. W.: Effect of training on physical fitness of women students. J. appl. Physiol.16, 167–169 (1961).Google Scholar
  29. : Physical fitness of college students in South Africa, United States of America, and England. Res. Quart. Amer. Ass. Hlth phys. Educ.34, 244–248 (1963).Google Scholar
  30. : Physical fitness of Cape Town high school children. S. Afr. med. J.40, 682–687 (1966).Google Scholar
  31. , andE. N. Keen: The harvard step test of physical fitness. S. Afr. J. Sci.55, 113–116 (1959a).Google Scholar
  32. : Physical fitness of oarsmen and rugby players before and after training. J. appl. Physiol.14, 635–636 (1959b).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. W. Sloan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations