Skip to main content
Log in

Thec logc contribution to the electrolyte conductance and Onsager's reciprocal relation

  • Published:
Journal of Solution Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The differential equations and the boundary conditions for the nonequilibrium binary distribution function of an unsymmetrical binary electrolyte are derived from the Ebeling-Falkenhagen continuity equation. The connection between the Onsager reciprocal relation and the binary distribution functions is shown. Further, Feistel's result for thec logc contribution to the conductance is extended to unsymmetrical binary electrolytes. The reason for the difference between Feistel's and Chen'sc logc term is explained, and the significance of Onsager's reciprocal relation for the calculation ofc logc and higher-concentration contributions of the conductance is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. S. Chen,J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2022 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. S. Chen, Ph.D. Thesis, Yale University (1969); M. S. Chen and L. Onsager,J. Phys. Chem. 81, 2017 (1977).

  3. R. Feistel, Doctoral Thesis, W.-Pieck-Universität, Rostock (1976); R. Feistel,Z. Phys. Chem. (Leipzig) 259, 369 (1978).

  4. H. Falkenhagen and W. Ebeling,Phys. Lett. 15, 131 (1965); W. Ebeling,Ann. Phys. 16, 147 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. Falkenhagen, W. Ebeling, and H. G. Hertz,Theorie der Elektrolyte (S. Hirzel Verlag, Leipzig, 1971; H. Falkenhagen, W. Ebeling, and W. D. Kraeft, inIonic Interactions, Vol. 1, S. Petrucci, ed. (Academic Press, New York, London, 1971), Chapter 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Ebeling, R. Feistel, G. Kelbg, and R. Sändig,J. Non-Equilibr. Thermodyn. 3, 11 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. Ebeling, R. Feistel, and R. Sändig,J. Solution Chem. 8, 53 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Onsager,Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931); L. Onsager and R. M. Fuoss,J. Phys. Chem. 36, 2689 (1932); D. D. Fitts,Nonequilibrium Thermodynamics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. Fuoss and F. Accascina,Electrolytic Conductance (Interscience, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Kremp,Ann. Phys. 17, 278 (1966);18, 237, 246 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Sändig, Doctoral Thesis, W.-Pieck-Universität, Rostock (1973).

  12. J.-C. Justice,J. Solution Chem. 7, 11 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Sändig, R. Feistel, and H. Künstner, Rostocker Physikalische Manuskripte Bd. 4, W.-Pieck-Universität, Rostock (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Sändig, R. Feistel, H. Ulbricht, Ch. Baudisch, and H. Künstner,Wiss. Z. Univ. Rostock, Math. Naturwiss. Reihe 26, 635 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. G. Miller,J. Phys. Chem. 70 2639 (1966); D. G. Miller, Faraday Discuss. No. 64, 295 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Haase and J. Richter,Z. Naturforsch. Teil A 22, 1761 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Yamakawa,J. Chem. Phys. 53, 436 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. U. Felderhof,Physica 89A, 373 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Pitts,Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) Ser. A 217, 43 (1953); E. Pitts, B. E. Tabor, and J. Daly,Trans. Faraday Soc. 65, 849 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Falkenhagen, M. Leist, and G. Kelbg,Ann. Phys. 11, 51 (1952); G. Kelbg, Doctoral Thesis, Universität Rostock (1954); H. Falkenhagen and G. Kelbg,Z. Elektrochem. 58, 653 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  21. L. Onsager,Phys. Z. 27, 388 (1926);28, 277 (1927); R. M. Fuoss and L. Onsager,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 41, 274 (1955); R. M. Fuoss and L. Onsager,J. Phys. Chem. 61, 668 (1957);66, 1722 (1962);67, 621, 628 (1963);68, 1 (1964); R. M. Fuoss, L. Onsager, and J. F. Skinner,J. Phys. Chem. 69, 2581 (1965); R. M. Fuoss and K. Hsia,Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 57, 1550 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. J. Murphy and E. G. D. Cohen,J. Chem. Phys. 53, 2173 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Quint and A. ViallardJ. Solution Chem. 7, 137, 525, 533 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. L. Friedman,Physica 30, 509, 537 (1964); H. L. Friedman,J. Chem. Phys. 42, 450 (1965); G. D. Degani, Ph.D. Thesis, State University of New York at Stony Brook (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Barthel, J.-C. Justice, and R. Wachter,Z. Phys. Chem. N.F. 84, 100 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sändig, R., Feistel, R. Thec logc contribution to the electrolyte conductance and Onsager's reciprocal relation. J Solution Chem 8, 411–426 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716001

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00716001

Key words

Navigation