Abstract
A drastic resolution of the quantum paradoxes is proposed, combining (I) von Neumann's postulate that collapse of the state vector is due to the act of observation, and (II) my reinterpretation of von Neumann's quantal irreversibility as an equivalence between wave retardation and entropy increase, both being “factlike” rather than “lawlike” (Mehlberg). This entails a coupling of the two de jure symmetries between (I) retarded and (II) advanced waves, and between Aristotle's information as (I) learning and (II) willing awareness. Symmetric acceptance of cognizance as a source of retarted waves, and of will as a sink of advanced waves, is submitted as a central “paradox” of the Copernican or Einsteinian sort, out of which new light is shed upon previously known paradoxes, such as the EPR paradox, Schrödinger's cat, and Wigner's friend. Parapsychology is thus found to creep into the picture.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. M. Jauch,Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, 1968).
H. P. Krips,Philosophy of Science 36, 145 (1969).
P. A. Moldauer,Phys. Rev. D 5, 1028 (1972).
P. A. Moldauer,Found. Phys. 2, 41 (1972).
G. Ludwig, “The Measurement Process and an Axiomatic Foundation of Quantum Mechanics,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, 1972), p. 287.
D. Sharp,Philosophy of Science 28, 225 (1961).
B. d'Espagnat,Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Benjamin, 1971).
B. d'Espagnat, “Mesure et non-séparabilité,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, 1971), p. 84.
E. P. Wigner, “The Subject of our Discussions,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, 1971), p. 14.
C. A. Hooker,Am. J. Phys. 38, 851 (1970).
C. A. Hooker,Philosophy of Science 38, 224 (1971).
C. A. Hooker,Philosophy of Science 38, 418 (1971).
C. A. Hooker, “The Nature of Quantum Mechanical Reality: Einstein versus Bohr,” inParadox and Paradigm, R. G. Colodny, ed. (Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, 1973).
J. Hadamard,Cours d'Analyse Professé à l'École Polytechnique (Hermann, 1930), Vol. 2, p. 385.
J. Abelé and P. Malvaux,Vitesse et Univers Relativiste (Sedes, Paris, 1954).
H. Yilmaz, “Could Relativity Theory have been discovered in 1728?” (mimeographed paper).
H. Poincaré, “Sur la dynamique de l'électron,” inRendiconti Circolo Matematico di Palermo 21, 129 (1906).
R. G. Colodny, ed.,Paradox and Paradigm (University of Pittsburgh Press, 1973).
J. von Neumann,Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik (Springer, Berlin, 1932).
F. London and E. Bauer,La Théorie de l'Observation en Mécanique Quantique (Hermann, Paris, 1939).
O. Costa de Beauregard, “Irreversibility Problems,” inProceedings of the 1964 International Congress for Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, Y. Bar Hillel, ed. (North-Holland, 1964), p. 313.
O. Costa de Beauregard, “Is there a Paradox in the Theory of Time Asymmetry,” inA Critical Review of Thermodynamics, E. B. Stuart, B. Gal-Or, and A. J. Brainard, eds. (Mono Book Corp., Baltimore, 1970), p. 461.
O. Costa de Beauregard,Studium Generale 24, 10 (1971).
A. Landé,New Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 1965).
J. D. van der Waals,Phys. Z. 12, 547 (1911).
J. W. Gibbs,Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics (Yale University Press, 1914), p. 150.
H. Bergson,l'Évolution Créatrice (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1907).
L. Fantappie,Teoria Unitaria del Mondo Fisico e Biologico (Humanitas Nova, Roma, 1944).
R. T. Cox,The Algebra of Probable Inference (The Johns Hopkins Press, 1961).
L. Briliouin,Science and Information Theory (Academic Press, 1962), p. 294.
V. Fock,DAN SSSR 60, 1157, (1948).
W. Ritz and A. Einstein,Phys. Z. 10, 323 (1909).
E. T. Jaynes,Phys. Rev. 106, 620;108, 171 (1957).
W. M. Elsasser,Phys. Rev. 52, 987, (1937).
M. Riesz, “Sur Certaines Notions Fondamentales en Théorie Quantique Relativiste,” in Actes du Dixième Congrès des Mathématiciens Scandinaves (Copenhagen, 1946).
O. Costa de Beauregard,Précis de Mécanique Quantique Relativiste (Dunod, Paris, 1967).
A. S. Wightman and S. S. Schweber,Phys. Rev. 98, 812 (1955).
P. A. M. Dirac,The Principles of Quantum Mechanics (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1930, 1935, 1947).
H. Schmidt,J. Appl. Phys. 41, 462 (1970).
H. Schmidt,J. Parapsychol. 34, 175 (1970).
G. R. Price,Science 175, 359 (1972).
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).
A. Einstein, “Electrons et Photons,” inRapports et discussions du 5e Conseil Solvay (Gauthier Villars, Paris, 1928), p. 253.
E. Schrödinger,Naturwiss. 23, 807, 823, 844 (1935).
M. Renninger,Phys. Z. 136, 251 (1963).
O. Costa de Beauregard,Dialectica 19, 280 (1965).
O. Costa de Beauregard,Dialectica 22, 187 (1960).
O. Costa de Beauregard, “Discussion on Temporal Asymmetry in Thermodynamics and Cosmology,” inProceedings of the International Conference on Thermodynamics, P. T. Landsberg, ed. (Butterworths, London, 1970), p. 539.
D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice Hall, 1951), Ch. 22.
J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195 (1965).
A. Shimony, “Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, 1971), p. 182.
S. J. Freedman and J. Clauser,Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 938 (1972).
S. J. Freedman, “Experimental test of local hidden variable theories,” Ph.D. Thesis (1972), unpublished, and references therein.
G. M. Prosperi, “Macroscopic Physics and the Problem of Measurement in Quantum Mechanics,” inFoundations of Physics, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, 1971), p. 97.
G. Reece,Int. J. Theor. Phys. 7, 81 (1973).
A. Landé,Quantum Mechanics in a New Key (Exposition Press, New York, 1973), p. 11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Costa de Beauregard, O. Time symmetry and interpretation of quantum mechanics. Found Phys 6, 539–559 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00715107
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00715107