Foundations of Physics

, Volume 10, Issue 3–4, pp 289–307 | Cite as

Do metric standards contract?

  • T. E. PhippsJr.
Article

Abstract

We address the question: By what class of force-application programs must a meter stick initially at rest in an inertial frame be moved in order to transfer it to a relatively moving inertial frame without altering the internal energy state of the structure in the process? Such stress-free transfer of a metric standard is essential for moving-axis calibration (a neglected art in established relativity theory). In order to deduce the answer by reasonings appropriate to kinematics, it proves necessary to make an extension of the relativity principle to rectilinear (irrotational) accelerated motions, and to enhance the kinematic motion group accordingly. Since the physical motion groups differ, the answers we obtain to this and to the title question differ from those of special relativity. Our alternative kinematics thus leads to discrepancies that should be measurable atO(v2/c2).

Keywords

Energy State Internal Energy Special Relativity Inertial Frame Motion Group 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Cavalleri,Nuovo Cimento 53B, 415 (1968); also G. Cavalleri and G. Spinelli,Nuovo Cimento 66B, 11 (1970).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    P. Ehrenfest,Phys. Z. 10, 918 (1909).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Herglotz,Ann. Phys. (Lpz) 36, 493 (1911).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Dewan and M. Beran,Am. J. Phys. 27, 517 (1959).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ø. Grøn,Am. J. Phys. 43, 869 (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Cantoni,Nuovo Cimento 57B, 220 (1968).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    G. Herglotz,Ann. Phys. (Lpz) 31, 393 (1910).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Noether,Ann. Phys. (Lpz) 31, 919 (1910).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Møller,The Theory of Relativity (Oxford, 1960).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Born,Ann. Phys. (Lpz) 30, 840 (1909).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    F. G. M. Farley, J. Bailey, and E. Picasso,Nature 217, 17 (1968); also J. Baileyet al., Nature 268, 301 (1977).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. G. Newburgh,Isis 65, 379 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. P. Hsu,Found. Phys. 8, 371 (1978).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Pauli,Theory of Relativity (Pergamon, New York, 1958).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. E. Phipps, Jr.,Found. Phys. 6, 263 (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H. Goldstein,Classical Mechanics (Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1950).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. E. PhippsJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Naval Surface Weapons CenterWhite Oak

Personalised recommendations