European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

, Volume 249, Issue 5, pp 257–262 | Cite as

Intraoperative monitoring by transtympanic electrocochleography and brainstem electrical response audiometry in acoustic neuroma surgery

  • T. Lenarz
  • A. Ernst
Original Investigations

Summary

The preservation of hearing is a major aim of contemporary temporal bone surgery. Our present findings demonstrate that intraoperative monitoring is a key method for attaining serviceable postoperative hearing after the removal of an acoustic neuroma. Both electrocochleography (ECoG) and brainstem electrical response audiometry were performed in 96 patients operated on for acoustic neuromas. The specificity of the different monitoring methods was affected by surgical manipulations in addition to such non-specific influences as CSF drainage, core body temperature and anesthesia. In the present study ECoG was found to be more reliable in assessing the intra- and postoperative course with respect to the preservation of cochlear function.

Key words

Acoustic neuroma surgery Preservation of hearing Intraoperative monitoring Electrocochleography Brainstem electrical response audiometry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen NL, Berg H, Hammerschlag P (1986) Acoustic neuroma surgery: an eclectic approach with emphasis on preservation of hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 95:21–27Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eggermont JJ (1986) Electrocochleography. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol V/3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 625–705Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gibson WPR, Moffat DA, Ramsden RT (1977) Clinical electrocochleography in the diagnosis and management of Menière's disease. Audiology 16:389–401Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gibson WPR, Arenberg IK, Best L (1988) Intraoperative electrocochleographic monitoring of non-destructive inner ear surgery for hydrops: the intraoperative technique and preliminary clinical results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 5:170–176Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harner SG, Laws ER, Onofrio BM (1984) Hearing preservation after removal of acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 94: 1431–1434Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Höhmann D (1988) Prä und postoperative Horschwellen und Hirnstammpotentiale bei Akustikusneurinomen. Ist die neurinombedingte Schwerhörigkeit reversibel? Laryngol Rhinol Otol 67:611–664Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Höhmann D (1991) Pre- and postoperative hearing thresholds and brainstem responses in patients with acoustic neuroma: follow-up study using the middle fossa approach. Am J Otol 12:172–178Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanzaki J, Ogawa K, Shiobara R, Toya S (1989) Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery and postoperative audiological findings. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 107:474–478Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kemink JL, LaRouere MJ, Kileny PR, Telian SA, Hoff TJ (1990) Hearing preservation following suboccipital removal of acoustic neuromas. Laryngoscope 100: 597–602Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kveton JF (1990) Delayed spontaneous return of hearing after acoustic tumor surgery: evidence for cochlear nerve conduction block. Laryngoscope 100:473–476Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kveton JF (1990) The efficacy of brainstem auditory evoked potentials in acoustic neuroma surgery. Laryngoscope 100: 1171–1173Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lambert PR, Ruth RA (1988) Simultaneous recording of noninvasive ECoG and ABR for use in intraoperative monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 98:575–580Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lenarz T (1988) ERA bei retrocochleären Hörstörungen. Laryngol Rhinol Otol 76:123–128Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenarz T (1989) Intraoperative monitoring of auditory function. Meeting of Speech and Hearing Science, UCSF, Spring Quarter. University of California, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenarz T (in press) Intraoperative monitoring of auditory function in acoustic neuroma surgery. In: Tos M, Thomsen J (eds) Acoustic neuroma. Kugler, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenarz T, Sachsenheimer W (1985) Prognostic factors for postsurgical hearing and facial nerve function in cases of cerebellopontine angle tumours. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 78:21–27Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lenarz T, Sachsenheimer W (1991) Intraoperatives Monitoring bei Eingriffen im inneren Gehörgang und im Kleinhirnbrückenwinkel. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 248 [Suppl 11]: 258Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lloyd-Thomas AR, Cole PV, Prior PF (1990) Quantitative EEG and brainstem auditory evoked potentials: comparison of isoflurane with halothane using the cerebral function analysing monitor. Br J Anaesth 65:306–312Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Møller AR (1988) Evoked potentials in intraoperative monitoring. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, p 111Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Møller AR, Janetta PJ (1984) Monitoring auditory nerve potentials in cerebellopontine angle operations. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 92:434–439Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Møller AR, Møller MB (1989) Does intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials reduce incidence of hearing loss as a complication of microvascular decompression of cranial nerves? Neurosurgery 24:257–263Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nadol JB, Levine R, Ojemann RG, Martuza RL, Montgomery WW, Klevens de Sandoval P (1987) Preservation of hearing in surgical removal of acoustic neuromas of the internal auditory canal and cerebellar pontine angle. Laryngoscope 97:1287–1294Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ojemann RG, Levine RA, Montgomery WM (1984) Use of intraoperative auditory evoked potentials to preserve hearing in unilateral acoustic neuroma surgery. J Neurosurg 61:938–948Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    24.Prass RL, Kinney SL, Lüders H (1987) Transtragal, transtympanic electrode placement for intraoperative electrocochleographic monitoring. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 97:343–350Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Raudzens PA, Shetter AG (1982) Intraoperative monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials. J Neurosurg 57: 341–348Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schramm J, Mokrusch T, Fahlbusch R, Hochstetter A (1985) Intra- und perioperative akustisch evozierte Hirnstammpotentiale bei Kleinhirnbruckenwinkel-Operationen. HNO 33:495–498Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schramm J, Watanabe E, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R (1989) Neurophysiological monitoring in posterior fossa surgery, 1. Technical principles, applicability and limitations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 98:9–18Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Silverstein H, McDaniel A, Norrell H, Haberkamp T (1986) Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 95:285–291Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith MFW (1985) Conservation of hearing in acoustic schwannoma surgery. Am J Otol [Suppl] :161–163Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Strauss C, Fahlbusch R, Berg M, Haid T (1989) Funktionserhaltende Mikrochirurgie bei der suboccipitalen Entfernung großer Akustikusneurinome. HNO 37:281–286Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tos M, Thomsen J (1991) Management of acoustic neuromas. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 111:616–632Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Watanabe E, Schramm J, Strauss C, Fahlbusch R (1989) Neurophysiological monitoring in posterior fossa surgery, 11. BAEP-waves I and V and the preservation of hearing. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 98:118–128Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yingling CD, Gardi JN (in press) Intraoperative monitoring of facial and cochlear nerves during acoustic neuroma surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North AmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Lenarz
    • 1
  • A. Ernst
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of TübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations