Environmental and Ecological Statistics

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 7–19 | Cite as

Statistics: an essential technology in environmental research and management

  • C. Radhakrishna Rao
Papers

Abstract

Statistical methods as developed and used in decision making and scientific research are of recent origin. The logical foundations of statistics are still under discussion and some care is needed in applying the existing methodology and interpreting results. Some pitfalls in statistical data analysis are discussed and the importance of cross examination of data (or exploratory data analysis) before using specific statistical techniques are emphasized. Comments are made on the treatment of outliers, choice of stochastic models, use of multivariate techniques and the choice of software (expert systems) in statistical analysis. The need for developing new methodology with particular relevance to environmental research and policy is stressed.

Keywords

canonical coordinates cluster anlaysis cross examination of data discriminant analysis expert opinions exploratory data analysis inferential data analysis regression 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Denby, L. and Pregibon, D. (1987). An example of graphics in regression.Am. Statistician,41, 33–8.Google Scholar
  2. Fisher, R.A. (1935).The Design of Experiments. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  3. Jambu, M. and Lebeaux, M.O. (1984).Cluster Analysis and Data Analysis. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Jolliffe, LT. (1986).Principal Component Analysis. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Lachenbruch, P.A. (1975).Discriminant Analysis. Hafner Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Mahalanobis, P.C., Mazumdar, D.N. and Rao, C.R. (1949). Anthropometric Survey of United Provinces, 1941: A statistical study.Sankhya,9, 90–324.Google Scholar
  7. Nishi, R. (1988). Maximum likelihood principle and model selection when the true model is unspecified.J. Multivariate Anal.,27, 392–403.Google Scholar
  8. Rao, C.R. (1948). The utilizations of multiple measurements in problems of biological classification.J. Roy. Statist. Soc.,B10, 159–203.Google Scholar
  9. Rao, C.R. (1964). The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research.Sankhya,A26, 329–58.Google Scholar
  10. Rao, C.R. (1971). Taxonomy in Anthropology.Mathematics in Archaeological and Historical Sciences. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
  11. Rao, C.R. (1973).Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications (Second Edition). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Rao, C.R. (1975). Some thoughts on regression and prediction.Sankhyā,C37, 102–20.Google Scholar
  13. Rao, C.R. (1987). Prediction of future observations in growth curve type models.J. Stat. Sci.,2, 434–71.Google Scholar
  14. Rao, C.R. (1989).Statistics and Truth: Putting Chance to Work. [Distributed by SECS, PO Box 753, State College, PA 16804-0753.]Google Scholar
  15. Ross, N.P. and Price, B. (1987). Comments on environmental monitoring, statistics, and the law.Am. Statistician,41, 254–6.Google Scholar
  16. Wegman, E.J. (1990). Hyperdimensional data analysis using parallel coordinates.J. Am. Stat. Assoc.,85, 664–75.Google Scholar
  17. Wolfowitz, J. (1967). Remark on the theory of testing of hypotheses.The New York Statistician,18, 1–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chapman & Hall 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Radhakrishna Rao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations