Skip to main content
Log in

Finite axiomatization for some intermediate logics

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LetN. be the set of all natural numbers (except zero), and letD * n = {kNk|n} ∪ {0} wherek¦n if and only ifn=k.x f or somex∈N. Then, an ordered setD * n = 〈D * n , ⩽ n , wherex⩽ ny iffx¦y for anyx, y∈D *n , can easily be seen to be a pseudo-boolean algebra.

In [5], V.A. Jankov has proved that the class of algebras {D * n n∈B}, whereB =,{kN∶ ⌉\(\mathop \exists \limits_{n \in N} \) (n > 1 ≧n 2 k)is finitely axiomatizable.

The present paper aims at showing that the class of all algebras {D * n n∈B} is also finitely axiomatizable.

First, we prove that an intermediate logic defined as follows:

$$LD = Cn(INT \cup \{ p_3 \vee [p_3 \to (p_1 \to p_2 ) \vee (p_2 \to p_1 )]\} )$$

finitely approximatizable. Then, defining, after Kripke, a model as a non-empty ordered setH = 〈K, ⩽〉, and making use of the set of formulas true in this model, we show that any finite strongly compact pseudo-boolean algebra ℬ is identical with. the set of formulas true in the Kripke modelH B = 〈P(ℬ), ⊂〉 (whereP(ℬ) stands for the family of all prime filters in the algebra ℬ). Furthermore, the concept of a structure of divisors is defined, and the structure is shown to beH D * n = 〈P (D * n ), ⊂〉for anyn∈N. Finally, it is proved that for any strongly compact pseudo-boolean algebraU satisfying the axiomp 3∨ [p 3→(p1→p2)∨(p2→p1)] there is a structure of divisorsD n * such that it is possible to define a strong homomorphism froomiH D * n ontoH D U .

Exploiting, among others, this property, it turns out to be relatively easy to show that\(LD = \mathop \cap \limits_{n \in N} E(\mathfrak{D}_n^* )\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.H.J. de Jongh andA.S. Troelstra,On the connection of partially ordered sets with some pseudo-Boolean algebras,Indagationes Mathematicae 28 (1966), pp. 317–329.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Fitting,Intuitionistic logic model theory and forcing, Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, 1989.

  3. E. Graczyńska andA. Wroński,Constructing denumerable matrices strongly adequate for pre-finite logics,Studia Logica 33 (1975), pp. 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Harrop,On the existence of finite models and decision procedures for propositional calouli,Proceedings Cambridge Philosophy Society 54 (1958), pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V.A. Jankov,Some supereonstructive propositional calculi,Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 151 (1963), pp. 796–798.

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. Janicka-Żuk,Aksjomatyzacja pewnej klasy algebr pseudo-Booleowskich, (Axiomatization of a class of pseudo-boolean algebras, in Polish)Praca zbiorowa “Matematyka”, zbiór artykułów, WSP Kielce, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. Ono,Kripke models and intermediate logics,Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University 6 (1970),pp. 461–476.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.G. Mc Kay,The decidability of certain intermediate propositional logics,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (1968), pp. 258–264.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Wroński,Intermediate logics and the disjunction property,Reports on Mathematical Logic 1 (1970), pp. 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I am indebted to Professors T. Prucnal and A. Wroński for their valuable remarks concerning the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Janioka-Żuk, I. Finite axiomatization for some intermediate logics. Stud Logica 39, 415–423 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713551

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00713551

Keywords

Navigation