Skip to main content
Log in

Forage dry matter yields and psyllid resistance of thirty-one leucaena selections in Hawaii

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forage yields ofL. leucocephala (Lam). de Wit have been reduced as the result of psyllid damage sinceHeteropsylla cubana Crawford invaded the Hawaiian Islands in 1984. The forage productivity and psyllid resistance of 31Leucaena species and interspecific hybrids were assessed from 5 harvests in Hawaii during 1991 and 1992. The trial consisted of an augmented randomized complete block with 22Leucaena selections in all 4 replicates, 2 selections in 3 replicates and 7 selections in 1 or 2 replicates.

Forage (leaves and stems < 6 mm diam.) dry matter (DM) biomass yield over a 13-month period ranged from 1.4 to 34 Mg ha−1 from total DM ranging from 1.9 to 63.7 Mg ha−1. Percent forage fractions ranged from 49 to 78% (forage DM/total DM). The 10 selections in this trial of eitherL. pallida Britton & Rose, and its hybrids withL. leucocephala consistently produced both the highest forage and total DM yields averaging 22 and 40 Mg ha−1, respectively. This represented a three-fold increase in forage production when compared toL. leucocephala K636 (a standard around the world).

The excellent performance of theL. pallida lines was attributed to high psyllid resistance and seedling vigor. AllL. pallida selections with the exception of K953 exhibited good psyllid resistance.Leucaena diversifolia Benth. K749,L. pallida K376, andL. esculenta (Moc. & Sesse) Benth. K950 had the highest psyllid resistance (p<0.05). Psyllid damage was negatively correlated to forage DM yield at both harvest 2 and 5 (r=−0.55,p<0.01,n=94). Forage DM was positively correlated to seedling vigor for the first harvest (r=0.83,p<0.001,n=74) and combined harvests (r=0.88,p<0.001,n=74).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin MT, Williams MJ, Hammond AC, Frank JH and Chambliss CG (1995a) FloridaLeucaena forage trial: Establishment, forage production, and nutritive value. Agron J 87(5): in press

  • Austin MT, Williams MJ, Hammond AC, Frank JH and Chambliss CG (1995b) FloridaLeucaena forage trail II. Psyllid population dynamics and plant resistance. Trop Grassl: Submitted

  • Beardsley JW (1986) Psyllidae or jumping plant lice: Notes on biology and control. Leucaena Res Rep 7: 2–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray RA and Woodroffe TD (1988) Resistance of someLeucaena species to the Leucaena psyllid. Trop Grassl 22 (1): 11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker JL, Plucknett DL and Gonzalez V (1972) Varietal variation and yield trials ofLeucaena leucocephala (Koa Haole) in Hawaii. Bulletin Number 166. Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker JL, Sorensson CT and Wheeler RW (1989) Psyllid resistance from interspecificLeucaena hybrids. In: 2nd International Psyllid Workshop, Bogor, Indonesia, 16–21 January 1989, pp. 1–5

  • Evensen CI (1985) Effects of season on forage yield variation inLeucaena. Leucaena Res Rep 6: 88–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez KA and Gomez AA (1984) Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research, 2nd Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 313 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevarra AB, Whitney AS and Thompson JR (1978) Influence of intra-row spacing and cutting regimes on the growth and yield of Leucaena. Agron J 70: 1033–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesleighter LC and Shelton HM (1986) Adoption of the shrub legumesLeucaena leucocephala in central and southeast Queensland. Trop Grassl 20: 97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton C, Jones RJ, Shelton HM, Petty SR and Wildin JH. Potential for development and priorities for research into leucaena in Northern Australia. Proc Internat Workshop onLeucaena Res and Dev, Bogor, Indonesia, January 1994: in press

  • NFTA (Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association) (1988)Leucaena psyllids — A review of the problem and its solution. Leucaena Res Rep 9: 3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Othman AB, Soto MA, Prine GM and Ocumpaugh WR (1985) Forage productivity ofLeucaena in the humid subtropics. Proc Soil and Crop Sci Soc F1 44: 118–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan FJ and Brewbaker JL (1988) Cytological studies in the genusLeucaena Benth. Cytologia 53: 393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc (1986) SAS User's Guide. Statistics. SAS Inst Inc, Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw RH (1988) Climate requirement. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and Corn Improvement, 3rd ed, pp 616–617. American Society of Agronomy, no 18, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton HM, Lowry JB, Gutteridge RC, Bray RA and Wildin JH (1991) Sustaining productive pastures in the tropics 7. Tree and shrub legumes in improved pastures. Trop Grassl 25: 119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensson CT, Shelton HM and Austin MT (1994) Seedling vigour of someLeucaena spp. and their hybrids. Trop Grassl 28: 182–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensson CT and Brewbaker JL (1986) Resistance ofLeucaena species and hybrids. Leucaena Res Rep 6: 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele RGD and Torrie JH (1980) Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Co, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Beldt RJ and Napompeth B (1992)Leucaena psyllid comes to Africa. Agroforestry Today 4: 11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler RA (1988) Leucaena psyllid trial at Waimanalo, Hawaii. Leucaena Res Rep 9: 25–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler RA and Brewbaker JL (1989) Results from the international psyllid trial network. Leucaena Res Rep 10: 11–15

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Austin, M.T., Sorensson, C.T., Brewbaker, J.L. et al. Forage dry matter yields and psyllid resistance of thirty-one leucaena selections in Hawaii. Agroforest Syst 31, 211–222 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712074

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712074

Key words

Navigation