Argumentation

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 385–402 | Cite as

Being unreasonable: Perelman and the problem of fallacies

  • James Crosswhite
Article

Abstract

Most work on fallacies continues to conceptualize fallacious reasoning as involving a breach of a formal or quasi-formal rule. Chaim Perelman's theory of argumentation provides a way to conceptualize fallacies in a completely different way. His approach depends on an understanding of standards of rationality as essentially connected with conceptions of universality. Such an approach allows one to get beyond some of the basic problems of fallacy theory, and turns informal logic toward substantive philosophical questions. I show this by reinterpreting three so-called fallacies - theargumentum ad baculum, equivocation and composition/division - in the light of Perelman's account.

Key words

Fallacies universality rationality Perelman rhetoric philosophy ad baculum equivocation composition and division 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blair, J. A. and Johnson, R. H.: (eds.) 1980,Informal Logic: The First International Symposium, Edgepress, Inverness, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Crosswhite, J.: 1989, “Universality in Rhetoric: Perelman's Universal Audience”,Philosophy and Rhetoric 22(3), 157–173.Google Scholar
  3. Hamblin, C. L.: 1970,Fallacies, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  4. Johnson, R. H.: 1990, “Acceptance is not Enough: A Critique of Hamblin,”Philosophy and Rhetoric 23(4), 271–287.Google Scholar
  5. MacIntyre, A.: 1966,A Short History of Ethics, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  6. Marcil-Lacoste, L.: 1990, “Perelman et la Philosophie Anglo-saxonne.”Dialogue 29(2), 247–266.Google Scholar
  7. Mill, J. S.: 1971,Utilitarianism, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis. (Original work published 1863.)Google Scholar
  8. Moore, G. E.: 1903,Principia Ethica, The University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L.: 1969,The New Rhetoric (John Wilkinson and Purcell Weaver, translators), University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame. (Original work published 1958.)Google Scholar
  10. Walton, D.: 1987,Informal Fallacies, John Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  11. Williams, B.: 1985,Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.A.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Crosswhite
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishCollege of Arts and Sciences University of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations