Skip to main content
Log in

Die Feldresistenz der Früchte von Wildtomaten gegen parasitische Pilze

  • Published:
Der Züchter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Anonym: Annual report of the Agriculatural Experiment Stations, University of Florida, for the fiscal year ending June 30 (1953).

  2. Anonym: Second annual report of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization for the year ending 30th June (1950).

  3. Alexander, L. J., andM. M. Hoover: Progress report of national screening committee for disease resistance in the tomato for 1952. Plant Dis. Reptr.37, 317–324 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alexander, L. J., andM. M. Hoover. Disease resistance in the wild species of tomato. Res. Bull. Ohio Agric. Exp. Sta. No.752 (1955).

  5. Bonde, R., andE. Murphy: Resistance of certain tomato varieties and crosses to late blight. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.497 (1952).

  6. Brežnev, D. D.: Sovremennaja klassifikacija rodaLycopersicon Tourn. (Moderne-Klassifikation der GattungLycopersicon Tourn.) Trud. priklad. Bot. Genet. Selekc.31, 5–50 (1954a).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brežnev, D. D.: Ispol zovanie vidovogo i sortovogo sostava tomatov v selekcii. IDie Verwertung der Art-und Sorteneigenschaften der Tomaten für die Züchtung.) Trud. priklad. Bot. Genet. Selekc.31, 64–94 (1954b).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conover, R. A., andJ. M. Walter: The occurrence of a rulent race ofPhytophthora infestans on late blight resistent tomato stocks. Phytopathology43, 344–345 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Currence, T. M.: Tomato breeding. In: Kappert-Rudorf, Handb. Pflanzenzüchtung 2. Aufl. Bd. 6, 351–369 (1959).

  10. Day, P. R., J. E. Jenkins, andH. J. Wilcox: A search for resistance toDidymella lycopersici in the tomato. Plant Pathology5, 150–151 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dennett, R. K.: The association of resistance toFusarium wilt andStemphylium leaf spot in tomato,Lycopersicon esculentum. Proc. Amer. Hort. Sci.56, 353–357 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Doolittle, S. P.: The use of wildLycopersicon species for tomato disease control. Phytopathology44, 409–414 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gallegly, M. E.: Physiologic races of the tomato late blight fungus. Phytopathology42, 461–462 (1952a).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gallegly, M. E.: Sources of resistance to two races of the tomato late blight fungus. Phytopathology42, 466 (1952b).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gallegly, M. E.: Late blight fungus races—resistance. W. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.357 (1953).

  16. Gallegly, M. E., andM. E. Marvel: Inheritance of resistance to tomato late blight. Phytopathology44, 489 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gallegly, M. E., andM. E. Marvel: Inheritance of resistance to tomato race o ofPhytophthora infestans. Phytopathology45, 103–109 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goodman, O.: Breeding tomatoes to resist blight. Grower47, 179, 181–183 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grümmer, G., undE. Günther: Spritzversuche zur Bekämpfung der Fruchtfäulen an Tomaten. Nachrichtenbl. f. d. Deutsch. Pflanzenschutzdienst (Berlin)13, 122–126 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Günther, E. undG. Grümmer: Untersuchungen über die Fruchtfäulen der Tomate. Gartenbauwiss.23, 130–159 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Günther, E.: Versuche zur vegetativen Annäherung von Tomaten und anderen Solanaceen. Z. f. Pflanzenzücht.39, 325–338 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Iwanowa, K. W.: Dikorastuŝčie vidy tomata i ich značenie dlja selekzii. (Wildarten der Tomate und ihre Bedeutung für die Züchtung.) Trud. priklad. Bot. Genet. Selekc.31, No. 1, 95–124 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kelbert, D. G. A., andJ. M. Walter: Manalee, a disease-resistant early tomato. Circ. Fla. agric. Exp. Sta. No. S-72 (1954).

  24. Lamm, R.: Self-incompatibility inLycopersicon peruvianum Mill. Hereditas36, 509–511 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lehmann, Ch.: Das morphologische System der Kulturtomaten. Der Züchter,3. Sonderheft, 1–64 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  26. McGuire, D. C., andC. M. Rick: Self-incompatibility in species ofLycopersicon sect.Eriopersicon and hybrids withL. esculentum. Hilgardia23, 101–124 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rick, A. E., andA. F. Yeager: New Hampshire Surecrop—a new tomato variety highly resistant to late blight and moderately resistant to early blight. Phytopathology47, 28 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rick, CH. M., andL. Butler: Cytogenetics of the tomato. Adv. Genetics8, 267–382 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schick, R., K. H. Möller, M. Haussdörfer undE. Schick: Die Widerstandsfähigkeit von Kartoffelsorten gegenüber der durchPhytophthora infestans (Mont.) De Bary hervorgerufenen Krautfäule. Der Züchter28, 99–105 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  30. v. Sengbusch, R.: Das Verhalten vonS. racemigerum gegen den Erreger des Tomatenkrebses (Didymella lycopersici). Der Züchter5, 25–26 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walter, J. M., andR. A. Conover: Hereditary resistance to late blight of tomato. Phytopathology42, 197–199 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walter, J. M., andD. G. A. Kelbert: Manalucie, a tomato with distinctive new features. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. S-59 (1953).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit 2 Abbildungen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gr:ummer, G., Günther, E. Die Feldresistenz der Früchte von Wildtomaten gegen parasitische Pilze. Der Züchter 31, 106–114 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709860

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709860

Navigation